you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

How dare you assume that a trans woman is capable of having children! Trans women are just as capable of being unfruitful as "cis" lesbians! For all we know, they could be infertile! Original commenter in this screenshot is a bigot!

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lol I like your style.

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This tweet was my inspiration:

Also the idea they have that all trans men somehow want to have a baby, or have a vagina or a womb still. And that cis women shouldn't be "incubators", but apparently that's ok for trans men. Bit rapey that.

Sadly, I can no longer find the tweet. Either it's been deleted or the account was recently set to private. Or perhaps they came to their senses...? Ha! If only.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yikes. I don’t think anyone thinks what they’re alleging. Presumably if you want a baby you’re not removing your breasts and going on testosterone, but that’s just me. Safe to say this was a response to GC people pointing out that Mr. Penis left out trans men when talking about women as surrogates?

[–]RippoffOfLoveSStraight | Overuses quotation marks 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, that's the one.