you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Uranian 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I think you could dispense with the idea that being homosexual is a "preference" here.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When I first came out, we called it our sexual orientation. That never changed.

Transpeople changed it for us to eliminate our sexuality. They started calling it a preference. That infuriates me. If it were a simple choice, wouldn’t we like to be heterosexual? I will speak for myself: my life would have been much easier if I had had a choice. I was literally disowned by my parents and written out of their will for being a lesbian. This is a gut-level pain for me.

Regardless of what hardships our sexuality has caused us, sexuality is not a preference or a choice.

No, homosexuality and bisexuality is not simply a preference. It is our sexual orientation.

[–]notdelusionalbased faggot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For me, I don't know if my homosexuality is the result of choice. But I'm not concerned about it either way.

I've been asked if it were possible to become straight, would I do so? No, I would not. That's a choice.

But I like the term orientation because it offers room for nuance whereas preference infers nothing other than a choice.

[–]ThiccDropkickGay[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I did try to think of another word but I couldn't come up with one lol

[–]Uranian 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Innate sexual orientation would do :)

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sexuality carries all the meaning required

[–]lostinreverieMy ovaries are transphobic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

‘Requirement’, or something along those lines, would have worked.