you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Kai_Decadence[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah I was thinking more about the father angle and it's a poor argument. I was curious though and looked around to see of cases of fathers using women's bathrooms to change their baby's diapers and the women were saying they didn't have a problem with it and I think the difference between a father using the space and a creepy fetishistic AGP is that the father comes in with a baby and changing supplies which should signal that he's just there to change his baby's diaper and believe me, I know that there can be the possibility of a man using the child as a prop to gain access to female only spaces but thankfully so far I didn't come across any cases of this.

Nonetheless, you're right that it's a weak argument he made on that part. I'm not sure if this guy is a "male feminist" to be honest but I wouldn't be surprised if he was.

The racism definitely annoys me but there's not much I can say on that angle that this pissant won't try to twist so I probably won't even bother addressing it.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I could be wrong, but those changing tables tend to be in a place that's generally situated outside of the stalls, but still within the restrooms (if there are any in the restrooms in the first place), so if he is peeping, he would have to walk a little away and stick his head right into the stall to get a good angle to see the person, or get on the floor and crawl. In Australia, we don't have large gapes between the toilet doors. The only one toilet "peeping" incident I have was from a 6 yr old little girl, I think she was trying to look for a relative because she was calling out for a relative. I still did not like that she tried to look underneath my door.