you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Femaleisnthateful 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I personally don't have a problem with describing AGP as a sexual orientation. I haven't delved extensively into Blanchard and Bailey's work on it, but I understand it as an inversion of heterosexuality.

The problem arises from queer theorists and transactivists denying the existence of AGP and conflating the experience of it with the experience of actually being a woman.

Will keep an eye out for you in the news.

[–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a focus of sexuality on the self, but since the subject is heterosexual the solution is to see the self as s woman.

If I recall this is the standard explanation.

I feel this doesn't explain why AGP groups with other paraphilias though. I feel it's symptomatic of an overall sexual targeting error.