This is why we should just call them "he". They even take your pandering as an insult.

submitted by usehername from twitter.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

As far as I've seen, you haven't. Post the link.

It's at the bottom of my message that begins with:

The majority of the adults in the U.S. (where I'm from) are Christian, which is an Abrahamic religion.

But I'll post it again:

https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-470

And I added this one in the next message, but I'll go ahead and post that one again too:

http://scholarsmepub.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SJHSS-26459-461.pdf

You're just pointing out my comment, your original argument was:

"y thing we'd need to do is refer to men as weremen. No other words would need to change."

"I'm arguing that males shouldn't be the default, and that the word "man" should be kept and considered gender-neutral, while we call men something else."

That's called a suggestion, not an argument. You were the one who started arguing with me saying English isn't sexist, which I argued against and provided proof for while you provided nothing.

That's not how you investigate and argue. You theorise it's because they're effeminate, MRAs and other crap, but that's not what they're arguing. You need to look at their points and argue against their points. This sub so far has shown that TI's just love to pretend to be women for ridiculous sexist reasons.

I asked you a question which you didn't respond to, but based on your response, I'm guessing the answer is yes. As for this part specifically:

You theorise it's because they're effeminate, MRAs and other crap, but that's not what they're arguing.

HSTS (homosexual transsexuals like Laverne Cox and Blaire White) and some other types of trans argue that they are women because of their "lady brains", which has been disproven, and I do bring that up in fights with actual TRAs, but I didn't think I'd need to explain that to you. There are other points that they make that I have evidence against, but again, I'm not arguing with a TRA, am I? Are you just trolling?

That's not how you investigate and argue.

I obviously look at other sources besides this sub, but I told you to check this sub because it's a huge compilation of evidence of how they think. Better yet, check the trans and MRA reddit subs for yourself. I'm right. I also have personal experience with these people, but the proof of how they think is easily accessible online.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's called a suggestion, not an argument. You were the one who started arguing with me saying English isn't sexist, which I argued against and provided proof for while you provided nothing.

I've been saying it's not oppressive, (yes, English is sexist, I agree with that, not oppressive, there's a difference between the two) and that we don't need to change it.

If you're not arguing, then why did you say this:

"I'm not arguing that "man" shouldn't be the default. I'm arguing that males shouldn't be the default, and that the word "man" should be kept and considered gender-neutral, while we call men something else"

You're lying at this point.

But I'll post it again:

https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-470

And I added this one in the next message, but I'll go ahead and post that one again too:

http://scholarsmepub.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/SJHSS-26459-461.pdf

Those two sources are actually essays, NOT STUDIES (studies, papers which show research, surveys). The author made claims and used several sources to back them up. There's a difference between collecting raw data and interpeting and simply reading someone else's interpretation of them. You might as well blindly believe the bible.

Better yet, check the trans and MRA reddit subs for yourself. I'm right. I also have personal experience with these people, but the proof of how they think is easily accessible online.

Your research methodology is flawed. In research, you're meant to propose a hypothesis, develop a way to measure the demograph, collect and interpret data. You've outright assumed majority of male attitudes are misogynistic (I honestly don't see the problem with that until you start advertising it as fact).

Lmao men who want to be women are either:

Gay and effeminate, so they want to escape homophobia,

AGPs who have it as part of their humiliation fetish because they consider womanhood the most degrading thing there is,

MRAs who think women have it easy.

This is why I say your research methodology is flawed, you clearly ignored what TI's are actually saying and didn't differentiate between their argument and their motives (interesting how you didn't list that some are just misinformed and mislead). TRAs (including TIs) use their stated delusion, pseudoscience and emotion based arguments to get the government to settle on their proposed policies, along with this. Argue against their claims. Their fetishes is what we mock in our own time.

TI? Trans-identified? If so you are just wrong and there are a thousand examples on this very sub.

I am talking about Trans-Identified.

Edit: Wording

[–]usehername[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've explained enough. Have a good one.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You technically haven't. It's people like you are why the feminist movement have lost respect, you don't know the difference between a study and an opinion and have decided to blindly agree whatever feminist academic say with no critical thought to it whatsoever. Enjoy being brainwashed.