you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Femaleisnthateful 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I really like Colin Wrights work. He is very adept at debunking gender ideology scientifically.

From AMAZE: "gender identity is the deeply felt experience of your own gender". Circular, much?

The transcript, like all gender identity propaganda, just boils down to, "Well it doesn't make sense, and I don't get it" and we're told that it's ok to be confused, but just Be NiCe; accept what you're told and don't question it.

Here's my perspective. If the gender ideologues themselves can't make it make sense to educated adults, then we shouldn't be advertising it to impressionable children.

[–]AugustiJade 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I also find it ironic that they claim to be fact-based, and then state a bunch of disproven nonsense. Like, "male, female, both" - even if they were speaking of intersex people, which I'm sure they're not (though I'd not be surprised if they did to justify gender ideology), it's still not fact-based.

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

They identify as fact-based, you bigot!/joking obviously