you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fun read https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/religion_and_the_constitution

In the first instance, the Establishment Clause states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion."

The first instance, in Article VI, is a proscription of any religious tests as a requisite qualification for public service.

Compelled pronouns? "TWAW"?

I see a problem with the wording "official" religion. Maybe the EA would make Genderwoowoo conscripted beliefs "official", legally?

BRB, donating spring charity budget to WOLF...

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know that this is an imperfect analogy, but what I'm waiting for is a Scopes Monkey type-type trial where someone challenges the sex-is-a-spectrum-yet-you-can-be-the-opposite-sex-by-saying-you-are crowd in court.

My hope would be that the fantasy trial would finally allow biologists to confront the gender woo religion in court. Also that the ACLU, which was on side of science during the Scopes trial, be exposed as Big Gender-funded hypocrites when it inevitably sides with the Church of Genderology.