UK Bans Trans-Identified Biological Males From Women’s Prisons by P-38lightning in news

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Men would be crazy not to, right? /s

Three hots and a cot, and, in some facilities, up to seven cell mates.

Singer who tattooed anus creates 'vagina deodorant' for nether regions by HongKongPhooey in NotTheOnion

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well, soap and hot water applied regularly helps a lot too.

To the vulva (the external female genitalia), yes. The vagina is internal. User comment above yours is correct.

The More You Know…

Dad gets shamed for using a LEASH with 5-year-old quintuplets by HongKongPhooey in whatever

[–]one1won 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Eh. I have an 83 yo family photo of a rambunctious young boy leashed by his mom and his favorite grandma whilst strolling in public. That man agreed it was the best safeguarding for his young self. :) (American)

'I Hope You Get Raped': Based Kansas Woman Gives Pro-Life Activist A Whoopin for Coming to Her Door and Pushing Her Beliefs by HongKongPhooey in news

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Assault. The charge is Assault. (Definition: A violent physical attack, as with blows)

What, closing the door on the younger woman wasn’t “expressive” enough, assault was warranted?

You chose not to use the article title as your post. Huh.

Riddle Me This by Questionable in whatever

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For the majority of males who claim “trans” at or past puberty, it’s excessive porn. The addictive feedback cycle of porn addiction wrecks havoc on some men; the need for more extreme forms escalate; brain scans similar to drug addicts! The wors

It’s a fetish:

https://quillette.com/2019/11/06/what-is-autogynephilia-an-interview-with-dr-ray-blanchard/ (They’re calling it a “sexual orientation” in this article because these men want their fetishes protected under Civil Rights laws AS a sexual orientation- it’ll not just be gay or bi, but these fetishists, too. There’s also a push to rebrand pedophilia as a sexual orientation…. Blanchard is listed as a supporter on VirtuousPedophile website)

https://gettr.com/post/p1j8riu522b

https://gettr.com/post/p1im6t9e091

https://uncommongroundmedia.com/trans-identified-males-should-not-be-accessing-womens-spaces/

The Attack on Juul Is a Scandal ⋆ Brownstone Institute by HongKongPhooey in politics

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Biden recently stated he was going after nicotine.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/21/health/biden-lower-nicotine-transformative/index.html

The “Party of science” apparently determined to wring more $$$$ out of “health care” https://www.tampabay.com/news/health/study-finds-nicotine-safe-helps-in-alzheimers-parkinsons/2175396/

For starters, nicotine by itself isn't very addictive at all, according to Dr. Paul Newhouse, the director of Vanderbilt University's Center for Cognitive Medicine. Nicotine seems to require assistance from other substances found in tobacco to get people hooked.

I suspect Big Pharma targeting another (cheaper) option to address the medical conditions addressed in the article.

What makes nicotine especially attractive as a treatment is the fact it causes virtually no side effects, according to Newhouse.

"It seems very safe even in nonsmokers," he said. "In our studies we find it actually reduces blood pressure chronically. And there were no addiction or withdrawal problems, and nobody started smoking cigarettes. The risk of addiction to nicotine alone is virtually nil."

No side-effects means no additional, compensatory medications (ie no additional $) So, Big Pharma versus Big Tobacco. My money is on Pharma to win this.

The World's Most Taboo Legal Case. The Women’s Liberation Front filed a civil rights lawsuit in California that drew almost no coverage. A press corps gearing up to be outraged by the Amber Heard-Johnny Depp defamation case had zero interest in a lawsuit filed by far poorer female abuse victims. by Chipit in news

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

there can’t be that many people willing to stand up and argue in favor of housing un-transitioned inmates with penises and criminal sex-abuse records in cells with women. Can there? If agitating against that is bigotry, what’s progress?

Another great article on the deceptive tactics and deliberately not-publicized reality of the trans agenda.

Have you heard of this film before? Someone is putting a lot of effort into suppressing it. by Canbot in conspiracy

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In addition to exposing the capture of society and medical institutions by gender lunatics, the documentary does highlight Scott Newgent (sp corrected)

https://quillette.com/2020/10/06/forget-what-gender-activists-tell-you-heres-what-medical-transition-looks-like/

and Dr Miriam Grossman

https://www.miriamgrossmanmd.com/

who are emphasizing the horrors of the ideology.

Too many people shrug this crap off thinking “just be kind”. I’m looking at this doc as for them, not the already informed.

Am I misreading? I’m leery about the Women’s Bill of Rights Resolution, as introduced. by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just popped back to add this

When she called the clinic from home after the surgery, the nurse asked her if she was a TIM who had an ovary implant. I don't know if Leo is flat out lying, here. But if she's not, either the nurse really is that stupid and working in a clinic, or they're already experimenting.

https://ovarit.com/o/GenderCritical/93725/a-sad-surreal-reflection-on-a-tif-s-hysterectomy-trans-rite-the-complication-con

Sigh. The powers that be are truly determined to erase women. Not even the definition I cited above would may be adequate without something like “originally” or “chromosome instructed”.

Fifty years ago, we thought the word woman was clear enough, too…

My penis fell off but it regrew on my arm — now I’m a real man again by HongKongPhooey in NotTheOnion

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sorry about dudes dick (good luck to him), but this title made me think of this (scroll Up just above April 14.) https://t.me/s/nigheke1?before=270

Wait a minute - aren't these the same Democrats whose Supreme Court nominee just told us she can't tell us what a "woman" is because she's not a biologist? by Chipit in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So, a man and another man (who is called a “woman”) wrote to the Collins English Dictionary. Uh huh. And language influences society. Yea.

Are you claiming that because an extremely well funded faux civil rights movement, strategized over decades by billionaires, has colonized academia, media, government, public education (by stealth), NGOs, etc, that material reality no longer exists? Legally? Wow. Wealth really is power.
Terasem: the idealized new world, (soon to be?) mandated, religion.

https://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/terasem-a-religion-tied-to-transhumanism-and-cryonics-6973859

Read their own words!

Books including:

“ The Apartheid of Sex: A Manifesto on the Freedom of Gender”

“ Your Life or Mine: How Geoethics Can Resolve the Conflict Between Public and Private Interests in Xenotransplantation.”

“From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto On the Freedom Of Form”

Denial of material reality. Genius, but nuts.

Wait a minute - aren't these the same Democrats whose Supreme Court nominee just told us she can't tell us what a "woman" is because she's not a biologist? by Chipit in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It was both simple and clear in the early 1970’s when legal decisions and legislation were made to address women’s rights and access in US. Sex meant sex; woman meant adult female human. Material reality.

Why is “the legal answer” “not simple” now? FeELinGs? $$$$$$$$$$$? Men’s sexual deviancies and women’s fear? ‘Cause you say so?

What is a man? What is transgender?(measurable and verifiable criteria please, personal testimony and beliefs point to a religious movement)

If we’re all “just people” then we’re on the Animal Farm, where some are more equal than others (due to the material reality of our physical bodies - influenced by reproductive function). Erasing the humanity of half the population.

The Dem party may well have broken it’s backbone fellating itself in exuberance over trans issues, losing numerous of the politically active (grunt workers) and voting backbone of the party, Dem women. More women are calling out abortion as the carrot on a string that Dems have been dangling for decades. Always shoving women to the back of the line in prioritizing issues will cost. BIG TIME.

Read the country. The other assholes are gonna sweep the elections. Left leaning Women have worked successfully with conservatives in past, and may yet again. At least the Repubs aren’t (yet) referring to women only as (bleeders, frontholes, bodies with - cervixes, vaginas, uteruses, etc.), whilst men remain men in name. Suck yourselves harder, Dems, hopefully it’ll be your last public fetishistic hoorah.

RUMBLE.COM Jennifer Psaki Breaks Down Crying Over Trans Youths by supervagina in whatever

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Fake, overly dramatic. Lousy actor.

May Karma get you, Jen. For those butchered and poisoned kids…

Project Groomer: Exposing the Secret Plan to Brainwash Your Kids *This is a Must Watch.* by JustLookDontDismiss in news

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Social Emotional Learning (SEL). The key term to look out for in education administration/curriculum materials.

GC: Why don't you get your gender identity legally changed? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You seem really attracted to lying, what’s up with that?

Meaning, No. “Self ID” scam is BS.

Dr. Oz is a rat, not to be trusted or endorsed! by iamonlyoneman in politics

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RINO

To what extent does the activism of AGP transsexuals shape transsexual politics? by nausicaa in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.the11thhourblog.com/

When in doubt, follow the money.

Jesus: The First Transgender Man by HongKongPhooey in whatever

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A quick look at the dictionary for the prefix…

Yet the dictionary definition of “woman” they dispute.
Wackadoodles.

GC: Why don't you get your gender identity legally changed? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hold the phone! I’m not going back on hypothesizing that a critical mass of GC men may be capable of cracking the identity movement. So there’s no “180” here. I am NOT a man. (Man meaning adult human male. ie sexed)

GC: Why don't you get your gender identity legally changed? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From July 2021, FYI, referring to Stock:

she distances herself from “certain trends within feminism,” namely radical and gender-critical feminisms while taking issue with their “modern activism” (239). She hopes “for a better activism in the future”

And, about Stocks position:

sadly it is largely conformist to a reactionary politics.

See also the comments on the quoted review of Stock’s book. here: https://savageminds.substack.com/p/immaterial-girls

Women are not monolithic. Not every woman is a feminist, not every feminist is a Radfem. I read your comment as assuming Stock speaks as, or for, Radfems. Many women are refusing to say “cis” or “trans”, as there is no such thing outside the science of chemistry.

And, no. Infiltration is not the way for women. Detrans and Desisters are more likely to prove deleterious to the GII movement. But it’ll take time; some people do wisen up with life experience.

GC: Why don't you get your gender identity legally changed? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah, dude, your premise is faulty.

The strategy I outlined would expose that lie, via mass lobby.

Ffs, everyone (compos mentis) KNOWS it’s a lie. Women have spent decades publicly refuting the lie and warning of its consequences. Men are adding their voices. The problem is not “exposing the lie”, but counteracting the social meddling that’s been occurring for over a century. the indoctrination of children, the distracted, and the weak-minded for sexual access and control of the masses. Power, sex, control. So, () your condescension.

I predicted this response & addressed it pre-emptively.

No, you really didn’t. I stated GII is a defacto government instituted religion and I oppose it. Don’t hand wave that off. It’s not a “cop-out”. It’s a HUGE deal to informed American citizens. It’s against the First Amendment to the Constitution of my country. I get you aren’t American, but you just step back, dude.

Identity politics means if you have the "correct" identity, your speech becomes more valid on that topic…

Again, a faulty assumption. I submit relatively few are truly listening to the “identity” crew, evidenced by those who do, “peak”. Others who listen to TRAs support them out of their own interests (financial, political, social), but seriously, do you really think they think the “identifiers” words are valid?

The additional horror is the “identified” are being used, as marketing, as compliance drones, and worse. IMO, it’d be foolish and self harming for women to follow your suggestion.

GC: Why don't you get your gender identity legally changed? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No.

Gender Identity Ideology is now the Government instituted religion, IMO. Established government religion is unconstitutional in the US; I am not an adherent. I will not capitulate.

Signed, this GII Heretic

ETA:

If you truly don't believe in gender identity (as in, you're not attached to your own),

yeah, you’re a man. “stoopid females don’t know how they really are or what they’re talking about”. Pfphthhhh

if you believe transgender identification gives you extra privileges

Er, TI gives MEN extra privileges, it pisses all over me as a female, regardless of anything I could say.

there is literally nothing to lose & quite a lot to gain.

For MEN, for MEN, for MEN.

Have you mansplained this (how & what I could “gain”) somewhere for me to read? I’ve expressed my thoughts here:

https://www.saidit.net/s/GCdebatesQT/comments/8nq2/both_where_do_you_see_the_gender_wars_in_10_years/ (capturing my comment via permalink isn’t working for me tonight. ???)

Am I crazy for thinking "transitioning" is a way of lying? by jamescherry in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just wanted to debate if trans-identified people are lying

This sub loves debating issues concerning gender ideology:

https://www.saidit.net/s/GCdebatesQT/

Is Twitter throttling lurkers? by one1won in SocialMedia

[–]one1won[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I will never sign up for those sites.

Same.

Is Twitter throttling lurkers? by one1won in SocialMedia

[–]one1won[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

:)

Thank you for the info!

US, Washington State new law keeps secret the males in women’s prison reality. “for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions,“ by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

the “need” to keep information from the public is an “emergency” at the state level? Lot of “emergency powers” being utilized lately…

I have no words. by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blocked. I’m not reading this MRA, drama llama, poor me BS. Sod off user.

Joe Bidens handlers write everything down for him in large font (3 minutes) by Tiwaking in politics

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Err, just, what’s wrong with large fonts? Or high contrast? Hate to break it to you, but aging does affect eyesight for many. Mock that as you please, but, perhaps you’ll discover the inconvenience of small font some day.

The mental and attention deficits in regards to holding the currently obviously puppet-in-chief position, embarrassing.

Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and TRA reaction by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I reiterate:

If the gender lobby isn’t even a little uncertain about a nominee, I fear it may bode ill for women and children’s rights when cases come before the Supreme Court.

We shall see, in time, I fear, whether some people “lack critical thinking”, as you suggest, or if your own adherence to your political belief system position or party is, shall I say, superimposing your hopes/beliefs onto this judge.

Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and TRA reaction by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tuesday, March 22, at ~10 PM EST, Jackson stated she “could not give a definition of the word”, woman, (outside a legal case), in her hearing.

This nominee has woke ideology.

Pollak: We Cannot Have a Supreme Court Justice Who Thinks Constitution Is Racist by cottoneyejoe in NotTheOnion

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This scares me:

Jennings said that Lambda Legal had conducted a preliminary review of Jackson’s record, and it had given the legal firm “significant comfort that she can be trusted to administer the fair and impartial justice the country needs”.

https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2022/02/25/joe-biden-supreme-court-ketanji-brown-jackson-lgbt/

If the gender lobby isn’t even a little uncertain about a nominee, it bodes ill for women and children’s rights when cases come before the Supreme Court. (especially all the child medical “transitions” that happened based on the consent of a minor.)

US: A BILL To impose sanctions on foreign persons responsible for violations of internationally recognized human rights against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) individuals, and for other purposes. by one1won in politics

[–]one1won[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Global Respect Act passed the House, March 2022. Although the gov bill assessment suggests only a 20% chance of passing the Senate, the open-to-interpretation language and expansion of presidential powers are terrifying. Truly dangerous legislation sponsored by Representative David Cicilline (RI).

Kara Dansky on The American Global Respect Act (GRA). US, with global implications. by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://womensdeclaration.com

I wish I could sign a second time, for emphasis!

I dream about having this effect on such people. by jet199 in MeanwhileOnReddit

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Transgender military service. Analyses of the unadjusted NTDS data show that 29.6% of respondents assigned male at birth reported that they have served in the armed forces along with 6.0% of those assigned female at birth. In total, 20% of NTDS respondents reported some type of military service.

https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-military-service-us/

They're intentionally provoking outrage, this is not an accident that this is happening in every western country simultaneously. They want the revolutions in every country so the the WEF can put in a new government. "Arab Spring" but in the west. by magnora7 in whatever

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

divide-and-conquer wedges.

Terf Island…. The Gender Ideology BS is as pandemic as the virus narratives.

James Carville: I want to punch 'piece of s--t' unvaccinated people in the face by Antarchomachus in news

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

I wish what they’d do is pass a law to make you immune from liability if you punch some unvaccinated person right in the face, which I’d really like to do. If you ask me what’s my first reaction to you if you’re not vaccinated, you don’t have any medical reason not to be, you’re a piece of s---, OK? I just want to punch you in the god----ed face. That’s the way I look at these people," Carville said.

Anyone else suspicious Carville would be punching a lot of women and children, you know, the ones less likely to damage him back? What a “man”.

Canada truckers protest: Injunction granted to stop horn honking -(Yes, illegal to use a safety device so important we mandate them in vehicles!) by Antarchomachus in news

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As suggested on a tweet, bust out the bagpipes. Is street music unlawful in Ottawa? A multitude of voices yelling HONK could be impressive, too.

How much do we owe to strangers? by Houseplant in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is an assumption that it has been agreed everyone holds the belief that women are sentient humans. I fear this assumption is incorrect.

As women are simply physical bodies that perform roles, not individual persons in their own right, there is no limit to “ How much discomfort, fear, or risk of harm is acceptable”. To a frightening proportion of the populace, women simply are not worthy of consideration. So, there will be no limits. None.

Substitute “strangers” for “women” if you wish. We do appear to be descending into an increasingly egocentric dystopian age.

US: A BILL To impose sanctions on foreign persons responsible for violations of internationally recognized human rights against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) individuals, and for other purposes. by one1won in politics

[–]one1won[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for your stating your position.

My own is that this bill Will be used to politically target non adherents to Gender Ideology. I’m suspicious of an elitist and corporate backed ideology that has such tactics and aims as described in the Dentons Report.

from the Spectator article about the Report:

For example:

‘In Ireland, Denmark and Norway, changes to the law on legal gender recognition were put through at the same time as other more popular reforms such as marriage equality legislation. This provided a veil of protection, particularly in Ireland, where marriage equality was strongly supported, but gender identity remained a more difficult issue to win public support for.'

And

Although it offers extensive advice about the need to keep the trans-rights agenda out of the public’s gaze, the report has rather less to say about the possibility that advocates might just try doing what everyone else in politics does and make a persuasive argument for their cause. Actually convincing people that this stuff is a good idea doesn’t feature much in the report, which runs to 65 pages.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-document-that-reveals-the-remarkable-tactics-of-trans-lobbyists

This is not about LGB, whenever the T is attached. Has there ever been a Civil Rights movement with this much money, media, established organization (NGOs and charities), corporate, or political support? Has discourse been discouraged to the extent we’re seeing(/not seeing)?

They are mutilating physically-healthy children with severe mental disorders by CleverFoolOfEarth in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Proud. Proud?

I cannot type what I am thinking.

GC: Should GC men identify as "transgender", to expose the fact that every man meets the non-existent requirements? by SnowAssMan in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

At first, I thought the Penn swimmer Lia Thomas was doing just this. Sadly not. As with the Babylon Bee, we’re seeing reality is outpacing satire. Though, maybe if a critical mass of GC men could be organized…

The Transgender Debate is Over. by SnowAssMan in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

My New Year’s resolution is to leave flyers about town. (Stickering can be charged as vandalism here.) May I print your words to leave in Women’s restrooms? In full or in part? Inquiring with respect. :)

This is why the 'true trans' approach is a problem by BiologyIsReal in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no such thing as trans/cis outside organic chemistry.

There is a Gender Identity Cult, which now is being made a state established religion (funding and enforcement by government), unconstitutionally in the US.

I was just texted an opportunity to advocate! by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1000 characters

Gov. Kate Brown signed a law to allow Oregon students to graduate without proving they can write or do math by jet199 in politics

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

So, just identify as a literate person?

Both: Where do you see the gender wars in 10 years? by worried19 in GCdebatesQT

[–]one1won 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am Gender Critical.

What Debate? I’ve seen a No Debate Gender Identity Ideology movement.

I am, also, considering the global political machinations and media and institutional captures.

https://www.saidit.net/s/conspiracy/comments/8nr5/wow_bc_infants_act_consent_of_infant_to_medical/

How about some pessimism. Addressing your “gender debate” question specifically.

I think (those formerly known as) women and children will be sex-on-demand units for males.

I think medical experimentation on the traumatized, mentally unwell, young, or genetically XX will expand. Money talks, compassion will walk, orders will be followed, opportunities taken.

I see the Gender Identity Ideology movement as a men’s sexual rights movement. By men, for men, but ultimately for the rich and powerful men. It’s a grift; Trans identified people are just as much pawns in this scam as anyone else. It’s Big Dick energy and $$$$$.

By 2031, either you’re potentially useful in some way, or you’re… , um, in the way. Men’s sexuality unbridled may lead to the end of Homo Sapiens Sapiens.

I sincerely wish I am wrong.

This is why I have a hardline stance on language, public access, and against the public acceptance, or legislation, of the Ideology.

Greece mandates COVID injection for adults over 60, monthly fines for those who don’t comply by [deleted] in news

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pure ageism. My 80something yo mother already called this. Add this to the Saidit post of the three separately coded vials, guess which lot the elderly will get. Doesn’t Greece have a pension problem?

(Can’t find post, so dropping this article) https://www.newsfromtheperimeter.com/home/2021/11/24/slovenia-nurse-claims-there-are-3-types-of-vaccine-vials-one-is-a-death-jab

It begins. FBI raids house, terrorizes family of mom who protested local school board elections! by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I saw the similar claims. However, law enforcement used to investigate prior to taking such extreme actions. I tend to believe this woman hasn’t the tech know how or election access she was accused of having. My experience and cynicism says it’s “shut her up by shaking her up” under the guise of “suspected election tampering”. Garland’s Department is committed to addressing the “problem” of recalcitrant parents.

California lawsuit alleges a “faith-based belief system” by HelloMomo in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent article. Detailed and sex correct.

(FYI: WOLF matching grant fundraiser occurring now) https://womensliberationfront.nationbuilder.com/2021-holiday-match-challenge

Also:

The lawsuit is backed by a slew of supporting organizations, including Keep Prisons Single Sex, the Family Policy Alliance, Concerned Women for America, the U.S. chapter of the Women’s Human Rights Campaign, the Independent Women’s Law Center, and the California Family Council.

And yeah Amy Ichikawa, the Woman II Woman founder!

The mother of the queer teen rapist in the Loudoun County debacle looks exactly as you'd have imagined she would by wristaction in politics

[–]one1won 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What does Daddy think of his offspring? Let’s hear from him, too.

Abolish the Jury System – Amelia May Johnson by [deleted] in politics

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I addressed your post according to my perception of it. My perception of your writing.

You can't argue than twelve, random people will be well-verse in the law — it's statistically unlikely to the point of being nearly impossible.

Who, other than you, expects jurors to be well-versed in law? I offer:

The jury is the fact-finder, but it is left to "find" facts only from the evidence which is legally admissible.

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/resources/law_related_education_network/how_courts_work/jury_role/

With due respect, I find this article more informative and thought provoking than your opinion piece:

https://connectusfund.org/14-important-pros-and-cons-of-the-jury-system

You don’t take disagreement with your writing well, it seems. I foolishly bought into the good faith discussion/pyramid of debate rhetoric of Saidit. Silly me. Good faith is multiple “straw man” accusations from you. Ok. I’m out.

Favorability Voting is the Best Electoral Method – Amelia May Johnson by [deleted] in politics

[–]one1won 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I’ve long thought something like this (or actual conscription for a term) should be the process to fill the House of Representatives, leaving the Senate as is. Balancing people and power. (Or, at the very least, spreading the graft cash)

Abolish the Jury System – Amelia May Johnson by [deleted] in politics

[–]one1won 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Hard disagree.

Most Countries Don’t Use Juries

So what? But, Mom, no one else has to wear snow boots! Not a strong argument.

Juries are Uneducated

I’ll be right there to say the mentally incapable (non-PC: stupid) probably ought not be on juries. But I reject your “uneducated” label, I find that classist. It has happened that sound, detailed, careful thinkers have been labeled “uneducated” by elitists for not having an “advanced degree”/a college, or even high school, education, discarding the “school of hard knocks” and self initiative learners. Most legal cases that even make it to a juried trial aren’t that tough. Your position is only persons trained in law should decide? So a “specialists only” perspective? If one hasn’t a degree, that one is incapable of applying thought, experience, and hence intellectual discrimination? Wow. Just wow.

As I understand, both defense and prosecutors have say in seating juries in America. Perhaps the rules of jury selection may be reconsidered, example: number of jury candidates objections/rejections in the selection process. Why scrap rather than improve?

All problems you cite of a jury system can absolutely be retained by shifting to judges panel system, and indeed, become even more entrenched- harder to address.

Demand more/better of the system and citizenry rather than creating greater gulf between citizens and (constructed) society.

So, No. Nuh uh.

Do individuals with CAIS have female sex organs? Or do they have male sex organs? by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Roy Clark - Malaguena, one of the most difficult songs ever. A wild take on an old classic. Roy has never gotten the recognition he deserves because he was never that well known outside of Country music. He is, quite simply, one of the best guitarists who has ever lived regardless of genre. by Chipit in music

[–]one1won 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Filmed live, before a live studio audience The Odd Couple TV show. I remember.

Amazing sound in this video!

Roy Clark was a true master with stringed instruments.
I hated Hee Haw, but I loved the chance to watch and hear Clark play. Mesmerizing and joyful.

Disappointed in Vanessa Vokey by shinnygummy in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Didn’t even listen to the song, did you?

"Sunshine" was an energetic, happy-sounding statement of protest and independence. "It was just at the time of the Vietnam War and Nixon", Jonathan recalls. "It was looking bad out there. That song meant a lot to a lot of people during that time--

and

General Comment "Sunshine" is the feeling one gets from true freedom. "Some man" is THE MAN... the government AND the establishment. He takes control of your life, taxes (robs) most of your income, then uses marketing gimmicks to suck up the rest. Furhtermore, he drafts you and your children into foolish wars! The system sucks. Nothing satisfies anymore, because you're NOT free. The sunshine is gone...

https://songmeanings.com/songs/view/67621/

Not a conservative position at the time.
If this is “conservative” now, then f yeah, cause I’m neither a sheep nor a robot.

My, how you reveal so much about yourself in your comments!

Disappointed in Vanessa Vokey by shinnygummy in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/ScfUfsUlGro

This song for you to consider. Stop shilling for “the man”

Battle Hymn of the Women by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women fire up! 🔥

Action!

Battle Hymn of the Women by [deleted] in GenderCritical

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Women fire Up! 🔥

While Dem women whine about being politically homeless, yet “needing” to stay with the Democratic Party…. Ffs. Vote with your feet! Your actions, your choices! Reward only those who will hear and stand with women’s concerns. Screw parties. Issues!

Gender Identity… by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I should have posted exchange like this, I guess…

Colin Wright · Aug 29 It's OK to not have a "gender identity." I don't. Most people likely don't either, but are simply interpreting it as a reflection of their affinity for sex-related masculine or feminine stereotypes.

You can reject the entire concept and just live your life. That's an option too.

Oregano Jones, Lawperson. · Aug 29 I originally had one, but sadly I was a victim of gender identity theft.

John Jacob Jingleheimer Schmidt Aug 29 Replying to @OreganoJeauxns and @SwipeWright Totally stealing that.

Kethaera Aug 30 Replying to @OreganoJeauxns and @SwipeWright That's rough buddy. Did they get the pronouns too?

Control Freaks vs Respectful Autonomy by StillLessons in propaganda

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed.

Evil isn’t the real threat to the world. Stupid is just as destructive as Evil, maybe more so, and it’s a hell of a lot more common. What we really need is a crusade against Stupid. That might actually make a difference. -[Jim Butcher, Vignette (The Dresden Files, #5.5)]

My observations of Americans since the 1970’s: as disease and injuries became less likely to be experienced or fatal, daily conveniences and entertainment avenues for the individual multiplied, the will to act effectively diminished. Common sense and intellectual curiosity have been derided; education has been allowed to morph into indoctrination. Those who can’t be bothered to care will bear the consequences also.

Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times. [G. Michael Hopf, Those Who Remain (The New World #7)]

About accommodations… by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

While listening on a YouTube channel discussing TW in women’s sports, I’d heard a Olympian, of decades past, raise the question of Hubbard’s accommodations, so I was uncertain whether housing was an individual, team, or IOC decision. I hadn’t heard anything else on the matter. Hubbard is an economic outlier. I’ve, since the OP, found an article stating Simone Biles, and the entire US women’s gymnastics team, had all chosen to stay in a hotel in Tokyo.

As to the second item, I was thinking college dormitories and what used to be called boarding schools (are they still? I haven’t children). Shared room assignments are to be by gender identity, not sex now, for any institution receiving federal dollars, correct? (Where do NB go, anywhere they please? So, people without a gender identity are self limiting or assigned gender at matriculation?)

https://www.news-leader.com/story/news/education/2021/06/15/college-ozarks-fighting-order-banning-discrimination-based-gender-identity/7703272002/

I’m wondering whether more American parents may be surprised, this fall, by the impact of Biden Administration actions.

Or is COVID lockdown resuming?

ETA

Found this school district pretrial motion- nightmare described. First link below. Horrifying. (The lawsuit was given up in 2019. Trans prevails. Over six year battle). But, yikes, this reasoning: an effectively “compelled affirmation policy”? “Nowhere1 in the constitution is the Right to Not be seen naked”, without consent? Perfectly legal for strangers to look on your body, but don’t touch!?! Federal constitution wise. Note this is argument is based on a case about incarcerated persons…

1 Except for religious exemption, that’s likely viable. Until that’s outlawed as a consideration (see Equality Act)

https://adfmedialegalfiles.blob.core.windows.net/files/SPP_OrderMotiontoDismiss.pdf

https://www.aclu-il.org/en/cases/parents-and-students-privacy-v-district-211

Considering just deleting the post. Feeling pretty dismayed. No one told me clothes were for weather or fashion, only, not for modesty. Had no idea.

Dems have gender identity language and protection in the Infrastructure Bill by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You paint people with a broad brush. Enough with your criticism. If I don’t see it, it doesn’t happen. Be gone!

Next day edit. I reported shzprm for trolling. Account either did not read my submissions or did not engage in good faith. I refer back to their use of “you people” also. Fedposting accusations? I’ve seen no conspiracy to illegal acts submitted here.

Dems have gender identity language and protection in the Infrastructure Bill by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you! I have only mobile. The “section 20” threw me.

Dems have gender identity language and protection in the Infrastructure Bill by one1won in GenderCritical

[–]one1won[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

section 20 249(c) of title 18, United States Code."

Searching federal documents is a pain. Title 18 refers to CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. That’s prisons, if I follow the sections, though I’ve yet to find the referenced section with GI wording.