you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BEB 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I read an article about a woman who's trying this tactic (fighting gender ideology as a religion). I think she's a lawyer and she's collecting information to bolster her case. If I can find the article I will post it.

So much time is going to be spent fighting gender ideology through the judicial branch and exposing it for the lunatic hoax that it is... What are the Democrats thinking legislating gender ideology when it's all going to be undone by the courts, with the net result being making the Democrats look like guliable fools or tools of Big Gender's $$$?

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I read an article about a woman who's trying this tactic (fighting gender ideology as a religion). I think she's a lawyer and she's collecting information to bolster her case. If I can find the article I will post it.

Sounds like if you're talking about someone other than Cathy Brennan (Baltimore lesbian radfem lawyer who ranks in most TRA's TERF Top 5), then she needs to team up with Cathy Brennan. That woman fights trans ideology obsessively.

And RE: Big Gender - the Dems seem to pull these antics in every social issue-arena possible because the court battles cost them nothing and the distractions lead to crises, which are never let go to waste.

Also, Big reminder that Big Gender == Big Pharma == Big Donors, exactly

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Cathy Brennan has changed and now seems to be in an open feud with the US Terven. These days, to a casual observer like myself, Brennan almost seems on the side of the gender ideologists against rad fems.

I think there's more to Big Gender than the obvious profits for the medical and pharmaceutical industries, because the same laws destroying women and gays' sex-based rights by changing the legal definition of "sex" are being pushed in countries that have universal healthcare.

I think that there is something sinister behind all of this, because the intent seems to be to have humankind detach ourselves from our physical reality.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

because the intent seems to be to have humankind detach ourselves from our physical reality.

Yes, I agree, this is much more so the drive behind it, all packaged into the beautifully-wrapped package of social justice.

I just read about efforts to implement "restorative justice" into the US justice system, where perps and victims are supposed to "talk it out" to make restitution. How is that supposed to work for rape victims?

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I really feel that there are very sinister forces driving all of this. And my job for years was to pay attention to events all over the world and try to figure out the larger patterns.

I have seen rad feminists already protest against "restorative justice" specifically because of their concern for rape survivors. How horrible would it be for a survivor to have to talk through her experience with the perp? Horrific.

[–]ShieldMaiden 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is all to push transhumanism on us ultimately. Make us into inhuman things. Of course women get to enjoy like no time of being fully fledged human beings legally before male supremacists seek to dismantle to human race itself without our consent. Fucking degenerates.