TIM Blaire White claims to "no longer have DNA" due to taking androgen-blockers and cross-sex hormones

submitted by MarkTwainiac from self.GenderCritical

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]forwardback 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Promoting the fallacy that words don't matter makes you part of of the problem. Are you also a science denier? Bjkkiuhh cfgyggf bbghihb nvdderdfbk njhgfsgi bhg hh jiiu kkji. (Is that the future of human communication you envision? Entire documents of random keystrokes? It's not mine, and I WILL fight you fight you over having clear and common language!)

I posses the capability to understand if someone got a mental illness that makes them upset about their sex organs that they might not like saying ovaries or sperm or any shit involving sex organs in their own videos.

As a scientist, I speak science, Not mental illness.

If you think it is MY responsibility to "intuitively know" or guess at someone's meaning, HAHAHAHAHAA, I haven't the interest, time, or obligation to do so. In fact, I submit, as an Influencer, the accountability for precise language falls upon BW. If he/she/they/mnopqrst desires to be heard or taken seriously, then, BW better get the terminology correct!

And, should you live so long as to understand the impact of ageism! You'll be shocked, m'dear! Hint: you've been lied to that the young know everything, or are the only capable persons in society. Hobbling my old bones out of here. /s. Could probably physically best you IRL. Not a joke; I am genetically gifted plus have a lifetime of independence and adaptation. And I WILL mention the proponderance of my peers who are raising their grandchildren due to meth-addicted or just incapable, parents.

Edit. Not spewing vitriol at you, though I realize you may perceive it as such. IRL, I am very blunt in my language. I don't hate, just get very frustrated with counterproductive beliefs and approaches. shrug and smile. Please, do consider points presented. I fear you are arguing against your own best interests.

Edit2. What is wrong with deletions or especially edits? Were you taught your original response was the one and only to which you must cling? Many people find nuances and details in their own considerations which may be beneficial to share. Or, in retrospection, someone may decide their comments to be inappropriate. Do you fault people for self awareness? I find "but you edit or delete" complaints nonsensical, especially as some are on mobile rather than desktop. (Bigot? LOL. Joking)

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

As a human i speak human. I am all for right words and science but when a kid is talking about something painful its not the time and place to shit on it to prove how gender critical you all are.

It's not your responsibility to guess what other people are saying. However if you are a scientist you should have developed some critical thinking and with that its quite hard to not understand what Blair was talking about. You have to be completely obtuse or just out for a pound of flesh to misinterpret it.

I'm 43 my dear, i understand wtf ageism is. Saying you want kids in your late twenties or early thirties is not it. Try again.

You are not being blunt you are being belittling because you are incapable of understanding where i'm coming from. I get that that happens, in fact it happens a lot. You are not spewing vitriol at me but you call me a science denier, part of the problem and make more assumptions. Your might want to look up what vitriol means.

Your second edit you should look at the comment i replied to. You know, the one that made a screenshot of my comment before that and accused me of deleing or editing it later . the one with the crazy accusations which i am sure continued in that persons gigantic rant which i havent bothered to read because i'm 100% sure its full of more insults and crazy ranting.

[–]forwardback 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You are not being blunt you are being belittling because you are incapable of understanding where i'm coming from.

Then, perhaps you might have clarified better your position and its advantages? How courteous of you to define my capabilities for me.

I get that that happens, in fact it happens a lot. You are not spewing vitriol at me but you call me a science denier, part of the problem and make more assumptions.

No. I asked : "Are you also a science denier?"

Your might want to look up what vitriol means.

I did look it up just now to verify my usage of the word vitriol; from Cambridge dictionary:

violent hate and anger expressed through severe criticism:

So many people on social media assume severe criticism to be "hate speech" nowadays, I did not wish to presume whether or not you were one of those persons. Geez, can't even try to be nice to some people by naming one's own frustrations.

Since I don't speak human I'll make note to not engage with you in the future. Peace out.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not engage with me? Awesome thanks!