Are Rome and Europe the Root of Patriarchy in the Rest of the World?

submitted by MarkTwainiac from self.GenderCritical

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Sorry, not gonna bother until you learn how to resume stuff. Oh, by the way, English isn't my language. In fact, I've never lived in an English-speaking country ever, so yeah, cut me some slack. I'm surprised I've never noticed that "resume" as a noun becomes a synonim of CV. Thanks for the heads up.

Your choice, now. You can learn the virtue of being concise, like your middle school teachers should've taught you. Or you can keep living in a fantasy world where biology doesn't matter and females have been oppressed because males are evil - because another thing you didn't learn in school is sociology. Or science. Or history.

[–]MarkTwainiac[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Sorry, not gonna bother until you learn how to resume stuff.

Huh? Resume in English means to begin again after a period of interruption.

You can learn the virtue of being concise

Oh, c'mon. Is "TL;DR and I can't be bothered to read coz I have the attention span of a gnat" really the position you're now taking? You think that's an effective argument?

You've not refuted or attempted to refute any of my points - not a single one. You've only misrepresented the points I've made.

I have said time and again that biology matters and is the main reason females have been oppressed by males. But whereas you blame this principally on female biology - which you think makes all females inherently weak, fragile, deficient and utterly useless compared to all males - I blame this on males making a conscious choice to exploit their (average) physical size, strength and bodily power advantages over females to control, own and oppress us. And I further surmise that males did this for the purpose of a) gaining access to female bodies for their own male sexual pleasure; and b) to insure that the children born of "their" women were sired by them and thus belong to them.

you can keep living in a fantasy world where biology doesn't matter and females have been oppressed because males are evil - because another thing you didn't learn in school is sociology. Or science. Or history.

Bread, I think that between the two of us, you come off as the one who is poorly educated in all those topics and living in a fantasy world. I would happily take you on in a debate. I suspect I'd clean the floor with you.

I wish you well and hope that someday you can get over your internalized misogyny - and the disdain you hold for female humans coz of our reproductive capabilities which you see as deficiencies, and your lionization of the males of our species coz brute strength is what you seem to prize and admire the most.

[–]QueenBread 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Buddy, if you can't explain your social theory in a couple phrases, it means your theory is bullshit.

But sure, I have the attention span of a gnat. Oh, I hate reading so much I think I better stop reading what you write! See? You totally won. I'm not paying attention to you anymore and this CLEARLY means I have no arguments to make and you schooled me! P.S. I'm also a huge mysoginist, that's why I've been banned from Reddit and why I love hanging in this website instead.

Happy now? Good. Now shoo, kiddo.

[–]MarkTwainiac[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Buddy, if you can't explain your social theory in a couple phrases, it means your theory is bullshit.

So any ideas that can't be boiled down to bumper stickers or expressed in simplistic slogans like "TWAW," "trans rights are human rights" and "orange man bad" are, in your opinion, bullshit.

Do you really think such a POV reflects well on you? And is convincing to others?

You would discount and dismiss all the ideas in all ancient texts - as well as the works of such people as Homer, Chaucer, Shakespeare, Spencer, Thomas More, Martin Luther, John Stewart Mill, Mary Wollstonecraft, Thomas Jefferson, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, Lenin, Nietszche, Thomas Chesterson, Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, Virginia Wolff, Simone de Beauvoir, JP Sarte, Mahatma Ghandi, Martin Luther King, Dr Spock, Bruno Bettleheim, Germaine Greer, Gloria Steinem, Andrea Dorkin, Nelson Mandela and a zillion others - coz their ideas can't be expressed in "a couple of phrases."

Ad hominems are not arguments.

I don't know if you are "a huge misogynist" but from my perspective many of the views you've espoused on this thread are deeply misogynistic.