USA Supreme Court is failing girls

submitted by MezozoicGay from self.GenderCritical

Girls and their parents from Oregon opposed young TiM's (just boys, so who are still not on hormones, without surgeries, and looking like regular boys) in schools to enter women's locker rooms, toilets and other safe spaces and sex segregated facilities.

Supreme Court declined their appeal, so boys can enter same sex safe spaces freely from now on.

https://twitter.com/GregStohr/status/1335955357311643648

I am not complete sure how legislative system in USA works, but will that means that now any state can use this appeal rejection to rule out same rules to allow boys in girl's spaces?

I know a lot of cases when boys were coercing or molesting girls even in girl's toilets, and being punished only when caught in girl's toilets, not outside - both from news and friends fighting over this to save their daughters in courts (in most cases they were winning the cases, but boy's parents were just charged with a bit of money and that is it).

Now those boys have free pass, and girls would be punished, when this happens? Why no one thinks about safe spaces for girls? Why transgender boys are moved to girl's toilets because "they feel uncomfortable" in men's, but girl's concerns about feeling uncomfortable are just ignored even by Supreme Court?

all 3 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]MarkTwainiac 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

SCOTUS refuses to hear lots of cases that make it up the chain to them, for all sorts of reasons.

Failure to hear an appeal isn't the same as SCOTUS making a judgment on the issues in the case.

[–]Finnegan7921 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The person in question already graduated, and the rule was crafted specially for them, so the case is now moot.

[–]Constantinople 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tbh I'm pretty annoyed it was rejected without comment. I don't think thst would happen in Australia. As far as I know, reasons are always given as to why the ability to appeal is rejected.

The other part of me thinks reasons were t given becsuse it's such a clear area of state law that no federal court should rule on.

Still, the rejection of the right to appeal doesn't create precedent as law for s ye ate jurisdictions