you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]loveSloane 23 insightful - 3 fun23 insightful - 2 fun24 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Why are people who disagree with her admining a sub dedicated to her? It makes no sense. Everything they said about “those awful, awful, banned GC’s” applies to her as well and yet they want her page to not get banned. Super odd to silence the views of the person the sub is dedicated to discussing. I’m sure there’s a Harry Potter sub (or several), why wouldn’t they just go there instead of specifically a JK Rowling sub?

[–]BEB 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is there any way to ask them?

[–]loveSloane 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Not without getting banned lol

[–]BEB 12 insightful - 4 fun12 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I never posted on r/GC because I didn't want to create a REDDIT account, but now I'm thinking of doing it just to troll these cowards.

Same with Twitter - the British GC feminist Twitter squad really turned the tide in the UK, so I'm going to get a Twitter account to troll the gendxr speshals and all the corporations, politicians and celebrities who back them.

[–]BEB 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

CLARIFICATION: "those awful, awful banned GCs" was from me, not the r/JKRowling mods - sorry for the misunderstanding.

The section in quotes of my post is what the r/JKRowling mods actually said - and it was bad enough.