OMG- The Guardian has allowed a PRO- JK Rowling opinion! Is the world finally coming to its senses? Nah...

submitted by BEB from theguardian.com

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]vitunrotta 25 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 3 fun26 insightful - 4 fun -  (6 children)

My jaw dropped (so far I haven’t found it yet) when I saw this piece.

Then again, as mentioned, the writer is from The Observer. In any case, I will give the world’s tiniest applause to The Guardian for having the imaginary balls to actually put this up on THEIR website.

[–]BEB[S] 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I wonder if it's because the UK government pulled back on self-ID so the rats are deserting the sinking gender ideology ship?

[–]vitunrotta 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds pretty believable to me. Backtracking as much as they can, while also trying to be the Wokest News. Harrumph.

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Undoubtedly. Further proofs that most of these people are just supporters because it' s trendy and not because they actually believe that it' s the right thing to do or that they actually believe in it.

[–]BEB[S] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That would be most "celebrities" - they share a brain between them and are terrified of missing the bandwagon.

When it's revealed what a bunch of horse's asses the WOKE crowd pushing gender ideology was, I want to make sure we remember who betrayed women and hold all of them to account.

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I am with you on that.

[–]tuesday 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you so much. I feel the same. (but i'm not keeping track so hope you are?)

[–]SharpTomorrow 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well, the conundrum for trans activists, should they give a pass to harassers and death threat issuers because they are "trans"? Unfortunately, a lot of "feminists" and woke media decided that yes, violence and women is OK if a transgender does it because "more marginalized". But you can't call yourself a feminist and condone violence against women, wherever it comes from, thus libfems are not feminists.

[–]vitunrotta 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

libfems are not feminists.

I will crochet this shit and sell it to Gwyneth Paltrow.

Then I'll wait how long it takes for her to purify her nether regions by shoving it up her hoo-haa.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The Observer has a different editorial team and probably doesn't get any of the TRA bribe.

[–]NecessaryScene1 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But presumably, as they share the website, they must share IT staff.

At what point is there going to be another backroom rebellion, this time against the transphobic Observer? A lot (maybe even most?) of the anti-Suzanne Moore mob were something to do with the website.