you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TalkToTheVoid 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Like worried19 says, most are probably picturing post-operative transsexuals. That is who I used to picture anytime I thought about trans-rights, up until a few months ago, when the whole JK Rowling flare-up happened, and I looked into it more. I thought of someone like Laverne Cox's character in Orange is the New Black. I didn't think of her as a woman, but she didn't seem dangerous to women either. I thought most people who're called "trans" are post-op. I think most people are good, kind souls and want others to be okay, and this has been hijacked by the TRAs.

[–]BEB 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

According to a 2015 survey of 28,000 US transgenders by trans advocacy group The National Center for Transgender Equality, 89% of TIMs keep their male genitalia and 63% are attracted to women.

According to a paper published in the journal PRISON HEALTH in June 2018, and written by a trans sympathizer, US TIMs have a 19-65% lifetime incarceration rate, while the general US population has a 3% lifetime incarceration rate.

So, in reality, the majority of TIMs are heterosexual men with intact male genitalia who, for whatever reason, go to jaile at an exponentially higher rate than most people.

So, NO, "transwomen" are not all harmless. Some are in fact more dangerous than even normal men.

And yet California Democrats think it's Progressive to put these dangerous heterosexual men into an enclosed space with women, the vast majority of whom are in for non-violent crime, who cannot escape.

MAKE NOISE ABOUT THIS. THESE WOMEN HAVE NO ONE TO PROTECT THEM EXCEPT US.

[–]TalkToTheVoid 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Those are some sobering numbers :( Learning all of this has been shocking and upsetting. Do you happen to know why the incarceration rate has such a wide range of 19-65%? Shouldn't it be something like a single number like it is for the general US population?

[–]BEB 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a range because it's gleaned from different studies.

I'll find the PRISON HEALTH article with transgender lifetime incarceration rates and link it.

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I made a new post in this thread with a link to the study about the frighteningly high lifetime incarceration rate for US TIMs.

[–]TalkToTheVoid 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you :) I'll check it out