you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TarshishJupiter 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is sickening. I'm glad people are rallying in support.

I do have to agree somewhat with the judge in the fact that not having these vulnerable moments of confession on the web might be better for Sophie's emotional health.

[–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't think that is why the judge is doing it. The judge in some sense, maybe not a legalistic sense, is endangering that child and the judge's actions could be seen as hiding evidence of that. The judge needs to recuse because the appearance of a conflict of interest, in this case the interest of justice in the custody of the child and the interest of the judge's own role in the matter, are readily apparent. If the father is not a suitable "custodian" while these matters are sorted out, then I think the system is set up for a foster parent.