They then say it is GCs who are supportive of strict gender stereotypes and that they are the enlightened ones who came up with the idea of abolishing gender.

Same, crazy how they're so obsessed with analyzing their "gender identity" (made up of stereotypes and shallow ideas about fashion, makeup, hairstyles) but then turn around and accuse us of being the regressive ones? All because we follow a feminism that actually wants to free us from these constraints. No, I don't feel more womanly when I make a choice to put on lipstick and concealer that day, it's color on my face, that doesn't change my identity. It's the logical other side to not letting others tell me I need to wear lipstick to look presentable as a woman.

Similar to how we're arguing that women encounter sexism because of our actual sex, how we're born, our reproductive organs, and then they turn around and act like we reduce women to the uterus. So we ask, then what is sexism based on? "How you present", they'll answer, or "what gender you were assigned". Bullshit, like female infants, toddlers, young girls all over the world, should've just known to present gender more neutrally (???) when they encounter sexism, abuse, assaults because of being born with a vagina. It's all pure projection and classic DARVO.