The world does not operate in whatever convenient and contradictory ways you insist it does in order to virtue signal.

Your wants are meaningless nothings when compared to material reality. These arguments aren’t just intellectually dishonest, they’re wholesale stupid.

If page is male, why’d she get her breasts chopped out? Why does she take testosterone? Why does she identify as trans?

You are literally denying the reality of the transgender people you use to make yourself look holier than thou.

Today you can claim a man is the opposite of a woman but you have previously argued that those differences are something we made up, or that those differences are so miniscule compared to the importance of how one feels about them, that they may as well not exist. Now, when it is an opportunity to cry ‘misgendering’ sexed differences are so vast that male and female are opposites.
Do you see any flaw in your habit of arguing this way? Do you think it’s honest? Do you see why I cannot respect what you say and view it as nothing more than self-interested performance aimed at people desperate for acceptance and protection from reality?

You change what you claim more often than some people change their knickers. Why should anyone here take you seriously or accept any argument you make when you cannot stick to a single argument? You argue anything as long as it provides an opportunity to frame yourself as a nicer, more accepting person than us, but you literally deny the existence of actual transgender experiences if it’s easier to signal your alleged virtue.

It’s not a moral victory to use the people you claim you adore as a tool to flex how moral and nice you feel you are.