Qt, Why is gender so important?

submitted by HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (17 children)

Thinking qt might answer genuine questions? Running them off. Being slightly snarky in the space where you’ve seen qt behave appallingly? Literally chasing them with torches and pitchforks.

[–]beris😎 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (16 children)

You've both acted appallingly, and only one side gets banned consistently. Weird, huh?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I’ve had a temp ban or two and have been requested by mods to edit plenty of shit that I think is absurd like not being allowed to call a male user he.
There was the rape apology drama which garnered a temporary ban from the apologist, and spammers have been banned. Who else do you think has been banned?

If you find my behaviour so appalling, report it to the qt mod who abandoned you all. Or is his leaving our fault too?

[–]beris😎 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

What were you temporarily banned for? Was it, gasp, being toxic, perhaps? Surely not, because the most toxic thing gc users do here is 'disagree'.

been requested by mods to edit plenty of shit that I think is absurd like not being allowed to call a male user he.

And you don't think that maybe not being able to follow simple rules shouldn't preclude you from being in a space where those rules are in place to make the environment less toxic for the qt posters?

You're sure doing a shit job of proving you definitely aren't hostile or toxic.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I’m not trying to prove anything to you because I don’t feel any need for your approval lol. Untwist your knickers and cry about how shit we are to qt on Reddit if that’s what you enjoy. They won’t point and chuckle at the clown appointing themselves master of who may snark and who may not.. they will give you all the ass pats you can handle over your championing of the nasty women who don’t make their space cater to qt. Have fun.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

House, you gonna really keep this conversation going? You really gonna keep doing this when it doesn't matter what you say anymore, you flat admitted to not following the rules. All the bullshit about not agreeing with them and whatever else doesn't matter, it's childish and simple to follow a rule like that, and you managed to fail. Your reasoning is irrelevant, the fact that i fucking AGREE with you is irrelevant, you're failing the big part of the test and proudly admitting it.

they will give you all the ass pats you can handle

Not a good look from you in a GC echo chamber, bud.

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You two cut it now or I'm going to start deleting comments.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like this holds less weight considering you're still ignoring the self-admitted rule breaking.

[–]redarmyshrike 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

What are the usernames of the QT users who have been banned?

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I don't remember off the top of my head, moderation log only logs 2 months anyways so it's not like you can check. Pretty sure I've seen thegreensquid and circlingmyvoid though.

[–]BiologyIsReal 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These are the permant banned users, who are, as I said, a spammer or alt right:

https://i.postimg.cc/xjWYQrwj/Users-banned.png

No QT user was banned forever since I became a mod less than a year ago. Circling was temporary banned before that (although yourself has said that you'd banned circling, so...). I don't know whether squid has ever been temporary banned.

[–]redarmyshrike 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Actually, it's GC users who are disproportionately banned. I can't remember their usernames and there's no record of any of it in the moderation logs though.

See how I can make shit up too?

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

There is only a QT user who was temporary banned. All the permant bans have been mostly the same spammer who likes to pose as QT (but is not) and alt right users.

Per biology. Your mental gymnastics don't change fact. We don't have access to prior logs, doesn't mean I didn't watch them as they happened

[–]redarmyshrike 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

What do you even think this quote proves? Because it's not your point lol.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Neither of us can prove our claims, but there's a mod chatting here too who is actively confirming mine, despite being obviously biased in favor of gc posters. I don't know why that's making you so salty, but maybe chill.

[–]redarmyshrike 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I don't know why that's making you so salty, but maybe chill

Lol what? Are you projecting or something?

A mod confirming the temporary banning of one QT poster (circling, who you agree should have been banned) is not confirming your claim that QT is "consistently banned" or that the moderation is biased.

I'm glad you agree your claim cannot be proven though, one comment ago you were calling it a fact.

[–]beris😎 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

...yes. Fact isn't requiring of proof for it to remain fact. I'm eating dinner right now. I can't prove that to you, that doesn't change that I factually am eating dinner. The discussion isn't about whether I can prove that gc users aren't actively punished for rule breaking (which is objective fact, house misgendered the one qt mod in this very post and it's being ignored), it's that they aren't and that's the reason why you've got no opposition in your echo chamber, which is conjecture, but again considering the rule-breaking here being ignored, I'm feeling pretty confident im more right than not.

[–]BiologyIsReal 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is only a QT user who was temporary banned. All the permant bans have been mostly the same spammer who likes to pose as QT (but is not) and alt right users.