Tra/qt how is ‘examine your genital preference’ not homosexual conversion therapy?

submitted by HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You know I don’t care that your feelings are hurt by my knowing who men are. I absolutely do not care about the hurt feelings of a teensy wee group of men with emotional problems.

You’re still not answering any direct questions, until you manage to answer how we teach geometry with triangle meaning any shape, and say anything more concrete than “but some people use words wrong so language evoooooolves” ima need you to go repeat yourself somewhere else and if you come up with an answer that’s not vague af and evasive, I might bother with ya again.

Yet again you’ve dragged this topic back to your own hurt feelings over woman not meaning man, and won’t answer anything that requires more specifics than a two sentence chant.

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You know I don’t care that your feelings are hurt

I’m well aware

You teach it exactly the same. Diagrams , specificity when required. It isn’t difficult to conceive how you would teach it at all.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

And when the instructor says draw a triangle, what the fuck is the student meant to draw?

Do you really think it’s effective for words to not have distinct meanings and for everything to rely on context and diagrams? Or is this just the hill you have to die on to never have to admit that transwomen and women are distinct and seperate groups despite trying to force language changes.

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And when the instructor says draw a triangle, what the fuck is the student meant to draw?

Something that’s fits with the current definition of triangle. If they wanted what we conceive of as a triangle they could say draw a 3 sided triangle.

Do you really think it’s effective for words to not have distinct meanings and for everything to rely on context and diagrams?

Flexibility in language is important. That’s why we are typing on computers not scribing on thinking machines.

[–]Juniperius 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Student raises hand:

Teacher, what does "three" mean today? And what do you mean by "sides?" And what is "draw?"

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The culture would have distinct options that could be clarified.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What benefit is flexibility in definitions? Specifically, please.

So we add redundancy and extra words instead of having one term for one thing. Brilliant, language is now less effective.

We type because that’s we have keyboards and no thought transcribers. Jfc that’s just stupid lol