This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

BIR actually bothers to mod here, much like peaking. I’d rather keep them, thanks.

Besides, loads of actions are given second chances here, like when you told me I’m morally wrong and barely human for not helping a rapist I injured as he raped me.

Man is not a dehumanising term except to you. Why do you think the community should have its languages policed according to your idiosyncratic definitions of words?

[–]circlingmyownvoid2[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

It’s literally in the rules. Mods should enforce and not flaunt the rules. It’s pretty simple.

[–][deleted]  (7 children)

[removed]

    [–]circlingmyownvoid2[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    I can’t comment on that conversation or they will ban me again.

    [–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They wouldn’t ban you if you had apologised or made an effort to correct yourself but you chose to double down and defend rapists harder. Anyone would be banned for supporting g the rights of rapists, not just you, boo.