QT: Is there such a thing as a man wants to be a woman? + 10 additional questions

submitted by SnowAssMan from self.GCdebatesQT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Someone who doesn’t want breasts getting them removed is not a harm. They’re happier and not debilitated. You just don’t care value bodily autonomy.

Just like you keep not adressing the evidence that 13 years old girls have gotten their breasts amputated, which is something irreversible being done to teens, exactly what you claimed it didn't happen. And speaking of harmful practices trans identified girls are encouraged to do, I forgot to mention the horros of breast binding. But of course, you don't give a dam about what happen to young trans identified females, just like you don't give a dam about women being told to use de-humanizing "inclusive" terms to talk about themselves and female anatomy, or how women are being harmed because of males claiming to be "women" are invading (formerly) women-only spaces like bathrooms, refuges, sports, hospital wards, prissons, etcetera. Just like you don't give a dam about TRA policies distorting statistics and lying about women getting more violent. Just like you don't give a dam about dissenting women receiving death and rape threats, being smeared, getting fired, or getting physically assaulted for stating the obvious fact that men are not and will never be women regardless of how many hormones they take, or how many surgeries they undergone, or how many sexist stereotypes they try to live up to.

When it became clear this was just an ad homonym skred I just stopped reading and skipped to the next paragraph.

You call yourself a "woman", yet you have zero sympathy for actual women. We're nothing more than human shields for you. Let's be real, deep down you likely know that you will never been anything but what you hate the most. Why else, do you throw a tantrum every time people refuse to play along with the obvious lies about who you are? You need to be honest with yourself and learn to be comfortable on your own skin rather than live vicariously through trans identified children and teens.

And again.

Nobody goes through the wrong puberty as nobody is born in the wrong body. Who does enjoy puberty, anyway? Do you think that being unconfortable with your changing body is an exclusive experience of trans identified people? I wasn't exactly happy when my breasts started to develope or when I got my first periods or when I was told I have to shave because I was a girl. Was I a "trans boy" or "non-binary person" or whatever else? I mean, I don't wear dresses or make-up, so I must not be a woman, right? That is the obvious conclusion if I were to follow QT logic, right?

I went through the wrong puberty. One made me a monster and miserable the other would have been fine. So some People do go through the wrong puberty. Just because you didn’t want the other one doesn’t mean no one did. Objectively my life would have been better without male puberty. How can you deny that?

Listen, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, more commonly known as "puberty blockers" are NOT reversible

Doctors say different. I’ll trust them over you.

Yet she later regreted all of this. How can you say children and teens are mature enough to consent to any of this?

I said teens not children. Stop misquoting me. And a tiny regret rate doesn’t negate possible consent. Some 5 percent of adults regret breast augmentation. Should that be illegal?

It is sometimes transition or suicide. I personally hit that point. I made a pro con list.

why are trans identified people are offered hormones and surgeries to "transition", but no one thinks on giving anorexic patients a liposuction?

Please stop comparing gender dysphoria and anorexia. They aren’t the same. I currently have diagnosis for both. (After a reevaluation my Ednos diagnosis was recatagorized, not a great congratulations on the weight loss present). They are not the same thing and it’s extremely disrespectful to try to force a comparison.

And you have the nerve to complaining that I or others can't provide you with the data you ask for when it's trans activists who are doing the very best not to allow any debate or research that may contradicts their dogmas? It's trans activists who don't want people researching detransition or recent changes in the demographis of young patients with gender dysphoria. It's transactivists who seek to punish anyone raising safeguarding concerns or just get a more a cautios position. All of this under excuse that it's anti-"trans" propaganda. What a joke! Anything it's "transphobic" for you all, starting with reality itself.

Nobody cares if unbiased and fair research gets done on detransition. But y’all aren’t doing that. That ROGD study is the perfect example.

[–]BiologyIsReal 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Someone who doesn’t want breasts getting them removed is not a harm. They’re happier and not debilitated. You just don’t care value bodily autonomy.

I "love" how you are still not admitting that irreversible stuff is being done to teenagers. And, of course, not mention of breast binding on your part. Is that practice "harmles", too?

When it became clear this was just an ad homonym skred I just stopped reading and skipped to the next paragraph.

And again.

How am I wrong about anything I said? You have proven time and time again that you don't have any empathy for women and you only view us as human shields and as a way to get whatever you want. You have shown zero sympathy about all the harm that TRA's policies causes to women, yet you cry over how the "mean" women aren't working on giving you third spaces. You dismiss women's issues, and yet you wan't we feel sorry for you. Maybe you should start complaining to trans activists. If they can get male sex offenders jailed alongside women, medical journals using stupid and de-humanizing terms like "bodies with vagina", or a 43-year-old man competing at a women's event at the Olympics, they surely have the power to give you whatever you want.

I went through the wrong puberty. One made me a monster and miserable the other would have been fine. So some People do go through the wrong puberty. Just because you didn’t want the other one doesn’t mean no one did.

Just because you weren't comfortable with your body it doesn't mean you went through the wrong puberty. You're talking about your own subjective feelings, not objective facts.

Objectively my life would have been better without male puberty. How can you deny that?

This is nonsense. You cannot know that because you are not female. Therefore, you have absolutely no idea what is like to go through female puberty. This all wishfull thinking on your part. Do you think if you were given GnRH analogues and exogenous hormones while you were growing up you would have gone through "female puberty" and you will now now a happy "passing transwoman"? You would not. You would only have more health problems by now because of starting with a induced hormonal imbalance at a earlier age. That is why you need to stop proyecting your own fantasies on children and teens.

Doctors say different. I’ll trust them over you.

The Pediatric Endocrine Society’s Statement on Puberty Blockers Isn’t Just Deceptive. It’s Dangerous - by endocrinologist Michael K. Laidlaw

Gender Dysphoria and Children: An Endocrinologist’s Evaluation of ‘I am Jazz’

Challenges in Timing Puberty Suppression for Gender-Nonconforming Adolescents - written by one of the authors of the Dutch protocol

Children's transgender clinic hit by 35 resignations in three years as psychologists warn of gender dysphoria 'over-diagnoses'

Why I Resigned from Tavistock: Trans-Identified Children Need Therapy, Not Just ‘Affirmation’ and Drugs

Are puberty blockers reversible? The NHS no longer says so

Children's gender identity clinic concerns go back 15 years - about Tavistock doctors' concerns over "puberty blockers"

Irish College of GPs reverses stance on puberty blockers

Time to Hit Pause on 'Pausing' Puberty in Gender-Dysphoric Youth - by endocrinologist William Malone

One Year Since Finland Broke with WPATH "Standards of Care"

Sweden's Karolinska Ends the Use of Puberty Blockers for <16: New policy statement from the Karolinska Hospital

Evidence for puberty blockers use very low, says NICE

Irresponsible Gender-Transition Treatments on Children - letters from two doctors

Is that enough for you or do you only listen to doctors that tell you what you want to hear?

I said teens not children. Stop misquoting me. And a tiny regret rate doesn’t negate possible consent. Some 5 percent of adults regret breast augmentation. Should that be illegal?

Adults and teens are not comparable. No, I don't think teens are mature enough to concept to "transition", especially not when they are being sold a lie by unscrupulous doctors.

And I want to note you're moving the goal posts. This discussiong began by you claiming that not irreversible stuff was being done to trans identified teens, and now you are talking about consent.

Please stop comparing gender dysphoria and anorexia. They aren’t the same. I currently have diagnosis for both. (After a reevaluation my Ednos diagnosis was recatagorized, not a great congratulations on the weight loss present). They are not the same thing and it’s extremely disrespectful to try to force a comparison.

I'm not going to stop anything. Saying they are not comparable tell us absolutely nothing. Explain why gender dysphoria and anorexia nervosa are so different from each other when both involve individuals with a distorted perception of themselves and prone to self-harm? You really don't know how to explain it, aren't you? That is why you, and other trans identified people, try so hard to shut up the comparison with claims of being "disrespectful". How convenient for you all that any question that threathens your beliefs are "offensive" or "transphobic".

Nobody cares if unbiased and fair research gets done on detransition. But y’all aren’t doing that. That ROGD study is the perfect example.

Again with the same nonsense. Do you seriously think you are going to convince anyone by calling anything you don't like anti-trans propaganda? Why don't you explain how they were biased for a change? Why don't you tell us exactly what a unbiased research looks like to you for a change?

[–]circlingmyownvoid2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

How am I wrong about anything I said? You have proven time and time again that you don't have any empathy for women and you only view us as human shields and as a way to get whatever you want. You have shown zero sympathy about all the harm that TRA's policies causes to women, yet you cry over how the "mean" women aren't working on giving you third spaces. You dismiss women's issues, and yet you wan't we feel sorry for you.

I’m ignoring your ad hominem attacks. You can stop.

Maybe you should to start complaining to trans activists. If they can get male sex offenders jailed alongside women, medical journals using stupid and de-humanizing terms like "bodies with vagina", or a 43-year-old man competing at a women's event at the Olympics, they surely have the power to give yo whatever you want.

As we’ve discussed as nauseum they don’t want 3rd spaces because they’ve determined assimilation is the path to safety. The trans woman in the olympics didn’t hit the base lift so hardly a ringing endorsement of your outrage. Bodies with vaginas isn’t dehumanizing. Its a specific group which isn’t accurately described by “women”. That’s like saying “bodies over 5’7” is dehumanizing.

Just because you weren't comfortable with your body it doesn't mean you went through the wrong puberty. You're talking about your own subjective feelings, not objective facts.

The wrong puberty ruined my life and made me feel like shit. So in that sense I am talking about feelings. Still the wrong puberty.

This is nonsense. You cannot know that because you are not female. Therefore, you have absolutely no idea what is like to go through female puberty. This all wishfull thinking on your part.

I never claimed to be female but I absolutely know my life would be better not having had my body ruined by male puberty.

Do you think if you were given GnRH analogues and exogenous hormones while you were growing up you would have gone through "female puberty" and you will now be a happy "passing transwoman"?

At least hormonally yes. And yes, I almost certainly would be what with the normal sized body, lack of cromagnon features and all.

You would not. You would only have more health problems by now because of starting with a induced hormonal imbalance at a earlier age.

That’s wild conjecture and contrary to the current medical guidance. At minimum I wouldn’t have less medical problems because I at least wouldn’t be dealing with the complications deriving directly from being forced to live as a man.

I listen to doctors who control actual guidance and aren’t in the pocket of the Christian Right and anti trans money.

No, I don't think teens are mature enough to concept to "transition", especially not when they are being sold a lie by unscrupulous doctors.

And I think that wildly undervalued bodily autonomy for a diminimous risk of harm.

And I want to note you're moving the goal posts. This discussiong began by you claiming that not irreversible stuff was being done to trans identified teens, and now you are talking about consent.

I literally never said that. I said nothing irreversibile was being done to those below their teens.

Explain why gender dysphoria and anorexia nervosa are so different from each other when both involve individuals with a distorted perception of themselves and prone to self-harm?

Because gender dysphoria doesn’t involve a distorted sense of self. It’s discomfort with the actual state of the body not a distorted image of that body. While distorted perception of the body is a factor in anorexia. That’s exactly why they aren’t compriable on this level. It’s comparing OCD and PTSD. They just aren’t the same thing.

Why don't you explain how they were biased for a change? Why don't you tell us exactly what a unbiased research looks like to you for a change?

That ROGD study spoke only to parents of trans people recruited from known anti trans web sites. They didn’t actually gather info from the trans people about a subjective experience and selected from an obviously biased selection.

[–]MarkTwainiac 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I literally never said that. I said nothing irreversibile was being done to those below their teens.

This is a lie. You said several times that nothing irreversible is being done to minors below their mid-teens. I asked you to say exactly what years you mean by "mid-teens" - 16, 17? 15, 16? - which you did not do. Various posters gave you evidence that irreversible interventions are being done on children not just before the "mid-teens," but in the early teens as well as before the teenage years even begin. The protocol used in an NIH-funded study sets 8 as the lowest age a child in the US can be put on both GnRH agonists (development blockers) AND exogenous hormones (estrogen or testosterone). We told you of boys - boys whose names were given: Jackie Green, Jazz Jennings, Trinity Neal - who were put on development blockers AND estrogen at 11 or 11-12. We also told you of girls who've been put on testosterone at 12, and on GnRH several years earlier, followed by T, and of girls in the US who have had their breasts amputated as young as 13.