you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

No. I’m saying they are taught it as normalcy and propriety from birth.

I don’t know what they want, but I doubt the average woman wakes up and says I will wear a skirt because it is womanly.

It’s not ridiculous, what’s ridiculous is the idea of anybody being truly gender conforming. Nobody meets every norm assigned to their sex.

I just don’t think gender is innate or particularly meaningful when one doesn’t obsess over it like qt does.

I disagree with gender relating to sexuality. How does sexuality translate to ideas like women are emotional, men are aggressive, girls are highly, boys are grubby etc? How does sexuality relate to gender at all?

I agree anyone who presents as gnc and actively makes an effort to do so due to gendered thinking has not escaped gender.
What about those of us who simply don’t assign a gender or sex to our preferences? Is that a lie we tell ourselves? Does that somehow affect our sexuality if the two are linked?

This seems like a whole lot of odd and some sexist assumptions being presented as something like factual or given knowledge.

How does the oppression of women fit into innate gender? Is that oppression the natural order?

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (22 children)

No. I’m saying they are taught it as normalcy and propriety from birth.

Is this the argument that says conforming people are naturally blank but the non conforming naturally have a personality that matches opposite gender cultural norms?

I don’t know what they want, but I doubt the average woman wakes up and says I will wear a skirt because it is womanly.

I think women do generally want to express some form of femininity and men do want to express some form of masculinity.

The small percentage of non conforming people are not evidence the majority want to be non conforming.

It’s not ridiculous, what’s ridiculous is the idea of anybody being truly gender conforming. Nobody meets every norm assigned to their sex.

Well if everyone is non conforming what is the problem? How could we tell if gender was abolished if everyone is non conforming?

The non conforming can't face discrimination because there is no minority of non conforming people to discriminate against.

I just don’t think gender is innate or particularly meaningful when one doesn’t obsess over it like qt does.

I don't think popular qt ideas on gender are entirely accurate.

I often think it's a mess.

I disagree with gender relating to sexuality. How does sexuality translate to ideas like women are emotional, men are aggressive, girls are highly, boys are grubby etc? How does sexuality relate to gender at all?

Women are emotional is a bad idea. Both sexes are emotional. They may not overall on average express the same emotions over time.

I don't think that gender is entirely sexual it can also be about other utilitarian biological drives. On average men are going to be more useful in tasks that require strength, for example violence. Where as women on average are going to be better at breast feeding. I don't think natural behaviour would be indifferent to that.

Evolution isn't planned, schematic or strictly rational.

I do think men are on average more aggressive in all societies. That does not mean all men are aggressive and women never employ aggression.

Does aggression play a role sexuality, well it often does, even if society objects to it.

I agree anyone who presents as gnc and actively makes an effort to do so due to gendered thinking has not escaped gender.

Agreed then.

What about those of us who simply don’t assign a gender or sex to our preferences? Is that a lie we tell ourselves?

Well if a person is strongly gnc, expressing a lot of opposite gender norms, and they say it has nothing to do with gender I think they are wrong.

That does not mean they should or ought to take on a trans identity.

Does that somehow affect our sexuality if the two are linked?

What do you mean by affect?

I think strong gender non conformity will affect how others see the person sexually.

Most people act on the sexual expression of others.

This seems like a whole lot of odd and some sexist assumptions being presented as something like factual or given knowledge.

Sure. I'm arguing a position of how I see things and why they are the way the are.

Can I see the political problems of some of the positions? Very much so. I can often empathise with a political rejection of them.

But I can't unsee the patterns.

How does the oppression of women fit into innate gender? Is that oppression the natural order?

Politically I oppose the oppression of women. I can't honestly say "women are oppressed" in my country Scotland. That does not mean I think society or government is perfect for women but gender oppression seems like an inaccurate description and unfair on the good work done by previous politica1l activists and unfair compared to women in cultures that are explicitly oppressive. But that's besides the point of the natural order question.

Men being on average more aggressive does not make it an ought. There is more than one drive in humans and they can be conflicting. Society can be over all better for men and women if we work to mitigate that aggression.

For example if men or humans in general have a natural latent urge for violence, cultural or state policies that seek to suppress that will be more successful than an assumption that violence is not natural and policies should built around reaching society without violence.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (21 children)

this the argument that says conforming people are naturally blank but the non conforming naturally have a personality that matches opposite gender cultural norms?

No. Nobody is arguing for the blank slate. Idk why you keep forcing points that aren’t made. I am saying humans experience sexed socialisation and we call it gender roles and nobody is raised without them.

Both sexes are emotional. They may not overall on average express the same emotions over time.

All humans do that lmao. How are they sexed?

I’m not even bothering with the rest lmao. Women can breastfeed so they’re naturally gentler 🙄

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (20 children)

No. Nobody is arguing for the blank slate. Idk why you keep forcing points that aren’t made. I am saying humans experience sexed socialisation and we call it gender roles and nobody is raised without them.

So where does the cross conformity come from?

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Preference. When you’re smart enough and mature enough to realise that men’s pants don’t make you less of a woman, you can make less restricted choices without fear of rejection from peers. Society is not as restrictive as it was historically in the modern west regarding clothes.

When less value is placed on conformity it’s easier to break free. Society always has those who reject certain constraints.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (18 children)

Preference

But you agreed strong gnc people are not escaping gender.

When you say

I agree anyone who presents as gnc and actively makes an effort to do so due to gendered thinking has not escaped gender.

If they do not agree with gender theory but act on a strongly gendered pattern can they be said not be acting on gender?

They are acting on gender. They did not create that gender pattern.

When less value is placed on conformity it’s easier to break free. Society always has those who reject certain constraints.

This is part of the problem I have. The GC side ends up seeing femininity as a prison and masculinity as freedom.

Women doing masculinity isn't the end of gender unless all women do it.

Everyone being masculine is internally coherent. It makes sense. In that case gender would be abolished.

But people don't want that and gc has a problem justify why anyone would want to be feminine. GC correctly points out that femininity is a social construction associated with women. But it often sees masculinity as neutrality.

[–]MarkTwainiac 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

The GC side ends up seeing femininity as a prison and masculinity as freedom.

it often sees masculinity as neutrality.

This is a total fantasy you have invented out of whole cloth. It's tosh that reflects your own genderist mindset & sexist prejudices.

Please stop telling other people with views different to yours - the vast majority of whom are women - what we think.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (15 children)

I take neutrality for granted. Femininity is something artificial that is only expected of women. The opposite of femininity is really neutrality, not masculinity.

Well this was said to me recently.

I find it confusing because they claim to be very masculine but also that they are neutral.

That everyone should be neutral. I find the desire that everyone should be masculine more internally cohesive as an idea. But impossible for natural reasons not because it is beyond imagining.

[–]Juniperius 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

For example, it is considered feminine to pluck your eyebrows. Which takes up a stupid amount of time, and is painful, and doesn't serve any purpose except to pander to the male gaze. If a woman doesn't want to pluck her eyebrows, people may consider that "masculine," when it may just be about not wanting to waste time on something that hurts and doesn't actually improve her life. There could be any number of examples like this. Femininity is often painful, time consuming, hobbling, expensive, etc. It's possible to not do anything active to make oneself look feminine, and also not do anything active to make oneself look masculine, and the result will often be interpreted by outsiders as being masculine.

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's possible to not do anything active to make oneself look feminine, and also not do anything active to make oneself look masculine, and the result will often be interpreted by outsiders as being masculine.

This seems to me to be a generational thing. I don't think it applies to older women. We are invisible to much of the world so outsiders aren't interpreting how we look as masculine, feminine or neutral - strangers/outsiders don't see us or register us in their consciousness at all.

I think it's a class thing too. Whilst it's true that many women "of a certain age" are into trying to stay young & "feminine" looking today like those TV housewives, a majority of working-class women I see & know are very basic & neutral in appearance - practical hair, no makeup, comfortable clothes, sensible shoes, little or no jewelry. Many younger women with jobs & kids that I encounter are the same way.

[–]theory_of_thisan actual straight crossdresser 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (12 children)

I don't expect male and female gender norms to be identical perfect mirrors.

It's possible to not do anything active to make oneself look feminine, and also not do anything active to make oneself look masculine, and the result will often be interpreted by outsiders as being masculine.

Well currently not cutting your hair is usually coded female. So that isn't a universal rule. Men very much are judged on what they are doing.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You act like there’s no possible way a person could stop associating gender to objects.

People who say silly things like they’d rather die than wear a dress because it’s women’s clothes are trapped by gender. People who wear skirts because they like skirts is not engaging in any sort of obsession over gender, whether conforming or not. They are normal people with preferences.

It’s possible to live in a way that could be considered gnc without making any active effort to be so. I don’t chop wood because I think it’s masculine, I chop wood because the fireplace is my main heat source.

I don’t wear dresses because I think they are feminine, I wear them because I don’t like how pants feel.

That’s preference. Most people go about their day without ever thinking about whether they are conforming to gender norms or not.

You seem to wildly misunderstand us if you think we view femininity as prison and masculinity as freedom. Both are stupid little boxes that have their own restrictions. The feminine box was created to control women, that’s undeniable. The masculine box exists to discourage men from shaming themselves with femininity.

Gender abolishment isn’t about everyone being masculine, it’s about recognising the obvious fact that the concepts of masculinity and femininity are restrictive bullshit and all people have a mixture of the traits assigned to one or the other.

Man you need to really badly do some reading on what gc actually says and what you insert between the lines and assert as common sense.