you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BigSecret[S] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

Those links are the top of the searches on google. All I did was search the intersex conditions up and they were there: https://imgur.com/a/FrWqgp5

[–]VioletRemihomosexual female (aka - lesbian) 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

males

Right there in your search it is stated they are males, and here you are, saying they are females.

And "gender identity" has nothing to do with biology. Anyone can identify as anything - that is completely subjective thing. Objective reality does not depends on subjective thoughts.

[–]BigSecret[S] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

Right ... the male part is for persistent mullerian duct syndrome, and I did say they are males (males with uteruses apparently). For CAIS they said 'people', and that they have a "female" gender identify. Do you mean CAIS are actually males, who think they are women? Are there any sources on CAIS being males?

[–]BiologyIsReal[M] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe try to read the links you posted... This has been explained to you before. Stop playing dumb or I'll ban you again.

[–]BigSecret[S] 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe try to give me better links that don't say things like "CAIS are females with testes and penises" and "males with persistent mullerian duct syndrome have uteruses". That's exactly what those links say and I highlighted them in quotes.

If that's not what the articles meant, they shouldn't have said the things they did, which I quoted, in the first place.