you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 15 insightful - 5 fun15 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

how can he misgender you when women don't exist since it is just a socially constructed category? Your gender doesn't exist, it's just a social construct. Your sense of being misgendered is a social construct you created. I'm not sure you exist. I imagine a series of static electricity discharges ran down a keyboards on a computer somewhere and created this account, created the random set of letters "Heimdekledi" and continues to create these incoherent posts.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Heim is deliberately inconsistent with the nominalism. Things heim doesn’t like are real, but women are just abstract ideas. Dehumanising with a philosophical excuse of ‘but humans don’t real :)’

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I think you give the static electricity that created that account too much credit. To leap form a semi-reasonable idea about categories and language, that as used by people reflects potentially unshared assumptions about definitions and unshared assumptions about how the world works along with limits on knowledge, to the idea that some words we use do not point to real and uniquely discernible things in the real word, or to the idea that there is no real word, is just babyish. These people must be spoon fed food and pretend some how that they endure. But this account we speak of takes it further by imposing their own fiction to replace what would be observable. Sex is real. Even plants have two and only two sexes, even self pollinating plants like corn. Let the non-binary people identify as a can of corn.

[–]HeimdeklediROAR 2 insightful - 9 fun2 insightful - 8 fun3 insightful - 9 fun -  (2 children)

Insults. Reported

[–]FlippyKingSadly this sub welcomes rape apologists and victim blaming. Bye! 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Since those are not sentences, my suspicions about static electricity might be accurate. I see no insults in my post, so that might also indicate a further random nature of these posts from the Heimdekledi account. Interesting.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex[S] 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

How can insults be real?