you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

This is not just naive, it's total gaslighting.

This is not gaslighting.

Most sex assaults and other kinds of physical assaults do not result in investigation, much less prosecution "to the full extent of the law."

That is certainly an issue that needs to be addressed on it's own merits.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

People are often not prosecuted at all, let alone to the full extent of the law. Saying it will happen is untrue. Saying something untrue is true can be considered gaslighting by all means.

Why is safeguarding and prevention such an offence? How does prosecution relate to prevention?

[–]GenderbenderShe/her/hers[S] 1 insightful - 7 fun1 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

People are often not prosecuted at all, let alone to the full extent of the law. Saying it will happen is untrue. Saying something untrue is true can be considered gaslighting by all means.

Gaslighting is manipulating someone by psychological means into questioning their own sanity. By your logic, every white lie can be considered gaslighting.

[–]HouseplantWomen who disagree with QT are a different sex 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You’re trying to convince people that prosecution is prevention, and that prosecution will always happen to the full extent.

You are trying to convince people that reality is not what we see, read, and hear, and otherwise experience, but what you think is happening or will happen based on absolutely nothing, in order to get them to support your wants.

You gonna answer any of my other posts asking you questions again and just focus on nit picking word games? Boring.