you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlanJam 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I feel like the phrasing of "sex is a spectrum" is kinda misleading, from what I can tell QT is using 'sex' different from how the average person would use it. That being said, I don't think QT could argue human reproduction is a "spectrum".

[–]JollyPurple 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm debating this argument in a different post. But really, one of the main issues in the 'trans/QT community vs the world' is the lack of definitive definitions and meanings behind their ideology. No one has any idea what they mean by anything they say. And they change meanings of words constantly too. One moment it means this, another moment it means that. Just whatever wins for the community in that moment.

[–]BiologyIsReal[S] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, exactly! They change words' meanings all the time without asking anyone about it, and then they get get mad when people use the "old" meanings. Even worse, they argue the "old" meanings never existed in the first place.

[–]FlanJam 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, QT doesn't seem to have consensus on what their ideology is. I've noticed that, depending on who you talk to, its not uncommon for one person to contradict another. I'm kinda curious how opposing QT views get along when there's so much disagreement.