All behaviour is either socially or biologically determined. Sociology's findings typically confirm the discipline's hypothesis, that the vast majority of behaviour is socially determined. People are products of their environment. Culture determines almost everything.

Biology is more of a catalyst. The idea that men should have more representation in everything that exists, whether it's creative or logical, brains or brawn, leader or follower, hero or villain, makes no sense from a biological perspective.

One could hypothesise that men's natural strength had them wielding power early on in human history, when physical strength mattered & that we are still reeling from their head start, but that would be ignoring the few cultures where men aren't the dominant ones. There is nothing genetic you can point to that makes these men different.

In the end, it always comes down to culture. The origins of culture are varied, but biology doesn't appear to play a great role there.