you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

GC - I'm going to be a little bit of a nerdy outlier here for the sake of good science. Hedonic levels do vary from person to person. Some people have very sensitive receptors and and low nociceptive (pain) thresholds; some have quite high thresholds. The hedonic zone of "pleasure on the edge of pain" really does vary widely from person to person (this assumes a healthily functional nervous system). So hedonics isn't a one-size-fits-all. Where sex positivity helps promote that realization -- great.

Equally, whatever role-playing and psycho-sexual exploration sane consenting adults want to do on their own time (within moral and social reason, and with some knowledge of anatomy -- quit choking each other FFS, it's a stroke risk!) -- great.

However.

worried19: "I think the sex positivity movement may have started off with good intentions, but as it stands now, it only serves men's purposes, pushing women to even greater heights of degradation and domination."

I couldn't have said it better.

[–]worried19[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Can't say I'm much for hedonism myself, but does hedonism have to equal violence?

I assume one can be promiscuous and hedonistic while still eschewing violent acts.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, no, not at all . . . meaning not hedonistic. I'm using hedonic here in the neural sense, the hedonic threshold. The point where skin receptors register pleasure just before it tips into overload and pain.

(edit for clarity)

[–]worried19[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No worries. I completely misread your initial comment. TIL about hedonics.