Open Source"Open source" was a confusing topic on Wikipedia, usually meaning the licence, the model, or the software. Several months ago I started a flurry of activity addressing this. Then I discovered SaidIt and forgot all about it... until now.

submitted by JasonCarswellDAT Mod from self.DecentralizeAllThings

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellDAT Mod[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It wasn't removed from November until this week. I wrote the comment that it needed tonal improvement (not deletion) before it was even changed from Draft to Article.

I had nothing about pseudoscience and don't think it applies as it means something else entirely.

[–]wizzwizz4 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The previous term was ambiguous.

[–]JasonCarswellDAT Mod[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Which term? Pseudoscience takes it in a whole other direction.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

"Proprietary science". I linked to a particular section of the pseudoscience article.

The great thing about Wikis is that if you're not happy with them, you can edit them. Citation 28 (at time of writing), used once, doesn't support the sentence immediately preceding the quote it's associated with, by the way; I added another citation needed sign.