all 22 comments

[–]Alphix 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Viruses don't exist. This is just more misdirection.

[–]zyxzevn 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Viruses do exist. They can even print them from mRNA.
In ibiology videos you can see vdeos of them reproducing in plants: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOxeJ0aEptU&t=1083s

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

These are exosomes.

Koch's postulates HAVE NEVER BEEN SATISFIED.

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No they are viruses in the videos.

And the postulates have been satisfied if you account for the fact that viruses cant live long without a host, and are extremely small to separate from other biological substances.
The sars-cov2 can not even stand the sun, due to its lab origin.
In this case you need a plant to "isolate" the virus.

And that is exactly what they did in the video.

[–]HibikiBlack 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

[–]EddieC 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

What is the core of the problem?

[–]Ehhhhhh 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've thought for awhile that project Veritas is limited hangout or some other stage of psyop.

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The CEO was boasting (at a WEF conference I think) that they needed to make new viruses to get the vaccine business running. They needed to create a market. David Martin had a video about that.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Not quite. It was one of the things they were looking at.

[–]AXXA 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Actually not my interpretation. It sounds to like they are already doing it.

"From what I’ve heard is they are optimizing it, but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious -- obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations,"

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Now I'm guessing fake. This Jordon at Pfizer doesn't seem to exist.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

You're right. It's just some dude that poses as a Pfizer exec to discredit Project Veritas.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

It's just some dude that poses as a Pfizer exec to discredit Project Veritas.

I think its just some drunk guy.

Project Vertias is self-discrediting, if it didn't verify its source.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

you know it's verified you dirty fed. suck on some real journalism.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Here's the scientists on the executive team at Pfizer.

Which one do you claim is this "Jordon"?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

who tf said scientist? maybe he's not even an exec. Project Veritas is trustworthy enough to assume they verified their source. PLUS pfizer did a press release to address this stuff.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

who tf said scientist?

"Director of research" was what project Veritas claimed.

maybe he's not even an exec.

No, he's not on the list on non-research executives either.

Project Veritas is trustworthy enough to assume they verified their source.

They're known for deceptively editing their videos. They're quite capable of lying about who someone is, whether or not they verified.

Here are pfizer's press releases. Which one do you claim addresses "this stuff"?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Do your own research kike

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Yes. That's why I showed you that there's no such press release from Pfizer.

Now that you've been exposed as lying about that: why did you lie?

Did someone report that and you believed it, or are you just spreading misinformation about Pfizer because you think they're evil, but not evil enough, so you have a drive to exaggerate it?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now that you've been exposed as lying about that: why did you lie?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

so you're just gonna duck me like an absolute shill? shalom.