you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Jesus said to love others, treat them as you want them to treat you and turn the other cheek. That leads to people working to improve society even when they feel slighted and mistreated.

These satanic teachings say things like "treat others how they treat you" which means that any time you feel wronged, even if that feeling is wrong, you will retaliate. That retaliation in turn gives the next person reason to retaliate against you, and retaliations are always worse than the initial slight. That leads to a spiral of hate and evil.

[–]Gravi[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

From what I learnt, the person who wrote all of this mainly took "inspiration" from other great works, possibly including the bible itself.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I'm not sure where that claim comes from, but I guess everything is dirivative if you are pedantic enough. To me it seems that, especially in it's effect, the teachings of satanism are quite the opposite of christianity. They are about selfishness, vanity, vengence, and narcissism. I think it might be intentional too.

[–]Gravi[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I don't see any evidence here that would justify calling any of this inspired by christianity. At best it is a direct attack on christianity by focusing on creating arguments that contradict christian teachings.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Given that most Christian teachings are the exact opposite of Jesus and the original Christians, it comes closer than you think. Maybe not inspired by him, but ends up similar by opposing the same bad and corrupt aspects of Christianity Jesus criticized the Pharisees for.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Actually I've been shocked. None of the sources agree, but a lot say they are against vanity, vengeance, and anything that harms thy neighbor. And they think religion does those things. About the only difference according to some sources is they're a little more selfish than the golden rule prescribes. Of course we're talking about edgy rebellious teenagers who only like Satan due to reverse psychology, not people who actually worship the devil.

A few have gone as far as to say Jesus himself is Satan. Which is of course ridiculous, but I can kind of understand it knowing that this Satan figure isn't the same as the biblical satan who plays the role of a demiurge. Ironically, by Christianity and Satanism's concept of Satan, Jesus actually does play the role of Satan literally by rebelling against the god of this world who is the actual biblical satan. So opposing the satan is Satanic, how about that. Funny how backwards religion can get things.

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Probably. "Satanism" was originally started by a bunch edgy rebellious teenagers who knew nothing about the satan of the Bible.

[–]grassfed 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

u/jesus happy that way

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I know, that's why I said neither teaches the golden rule. "Christianity" doesn't either, it teaches that you're weak if you don't retaliate, and "weak" people are ultra-sinners apparently. But the rest of so-called Christianity is "never question society, never question authority, never question the church, worship nature, worship evil, worship the devil, worship society, worship authority, obey the ways of the world and the flesh, etc." This is literally the Pharisees all over again.

“What do you think? A man had two sons. And he went to the first and said, ‘Son, go and work in the vineyard today.’ And he answered, ‘I will not,’ but afterward he changed his mind and went. And he went to the other son and said the same. And he answered, ‘I go, sir,’ but did not go. Which of the two did the will of his father?” They said, “The first.” Jesus said to them, “Truly, I say to you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes go into the kingdom of God before you. For John came to you in the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes believed him. And even when you saw it, you did not afterward change your minds and believe him.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

it [christianity] teaches that you're weak if you don't retaliate

It does not.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Usually it does. At least now. If you haven't been to a mainstream church in the past 5-10 years you may not have seen it. The current doctrine is "meekness is weakness". These people think the gospels are weak and impractical, even sinful, and only read the Old Testament and fake letters in the new. Ironically they've become obsessed with the "natural order" and evolution, and think survival of the fittest is a God-ordained process. Therefore we should bring death to all who oppose us and win a prideful victory, which is totally not exactly what the Pharisees wanted their messiah to do. A newfound obsession with gender roles and masculinity may be part of the cause too, because men apparently aren't supposed to be kind or humble.

[–]Alphix 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

THIS.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What good did persecuting the lowly Jew do to Christian societies? Eventually it ended in the elite Jewish class finding its way back into the fold, or they had never left, and lived among the Christians as conversos.

To an elitist Jew, mammon worshipping politician, usurer or vulture capitalist, prosecution is persecution and retribution is antisemitism.

Expulsion and persecution must never be held as methods to combat the Jewish question or any question for that matter. Justice, prosecution, retribution are the three rules to atop this madness and we can only do it by looking within ourselves, knowing who we are, refraining from looking down the rabbit hole, and working on obtaining judicature power.

Until then, whatever conspiracy you wish to expose, will be of no use. They got away with 9/11 because THEY 5 Zionist Jews controlled all aspects of the lawsuit/payout process.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Until then, whatever conspiracy you wish to expose, will be of no use.

...

Justice, prosecution, retribution are the three rules to atop this madness

The first is the only way to get the second. People need to wake up to the jewish problem before they can rally a response. That response does not habe to be anything other than making sure jews can't corrupt the systems of justice in favor of other jews.