you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]IkeConn[S] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Oh and please visit s/idfuckher for pics of clothed hotties. Clothed.

[–]RamblingOtter 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

It's refreshing for sure.

Cheapening white girls with all this disgusting porn is a sad thing to do. And it's all very particularly constructed. And the main audience is also very prescribed. You don't see many girls of colour getting seven guys ramming wine bottles in their arseholes, or you don't see girls from India getting on screen raped. That's reserved for white girls. And there's a reason to it too!

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Op probably Jewish

[–]mifu 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I agree that these photos are all in good taste and do not violate saidit's no porno policy.

[–]Totoro 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

and do not violate saidit's no porno policy.

What?! I am so confused that I have seen so much hardcore racist statements on here and porn is not allowed?

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

It's practical and simple. There's more than enough porn out there elsewhere, and we can't risk underage content slipping through and causing problems. We're already targeted free-thinkers and truth-seekers.

Hate is not a crime. Advocating violence can be.

[–]NuclearBadger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

porn is more damaging.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like your sub. It displays a certain taste in aesthetics, which I can value for most parts.