all 20 comments

[–]IkeConn[S] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Oh and please visit s/idfuckher for pics of clothed hotties. Clothed.

[–]RamblingOtter 9 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

It's refreshing for sure.

Cheapening white girls with all this disgusting porn is a sad thing to do. And it's all very particularly constructed. And the main audience is also very prescribed. You don't see many girls of colour getting seven guys ramming wine bottles in their arseholes, or you don't see girls from India getting on screen raped. That's reserved for white girls. And there's a reason to it too!

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Op probably Jewish

[–]mifu 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I agree that these photos are all in good taste and do not violate saidit's no porno policy.

[–]Totoro 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

and do not violate saidit's no porno policy.

What?! I am so confused that I have seen so much hardcore racist statements on here and porn is not allowed?

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

It's practical and simple. There's more than enough porn out there elsewhere, and we can't risk underage content slipping through and causing problems. We're already targeted free-thinkers and truth-seekers.

Hate is not a crime. Advocating violence can be.

[–]NuclearBadger 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

porn is more damaging.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like your sub. It displays a certain taste in aesthetics, which I can value for most parts.

[–]Optimus85 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

The sub name might be a bit crude but I don't see why it shouldn't be on the front page. With all the doom and gloom on s/all it would be nice to have a bit of eye candy there. I must point out that I don't really like girls with six-packs unless it's a drinkable and alcoholic kind of six-pack.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

[–]CreditKnifeMan 4 insightful - 8 fun4 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 8 fun -  (0 children)

Well. Maybe. It's because you're being sexist. Maybe.

You could test this theory by posting photos of dudes you'd, maybe fuck. Hypothetically.

I'll admit, it's a flimsy theory, but if it's wrong then everyone gets a laugh, and no harm done.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I demand justice for s/idfuckher

[–]LarrySwinger2 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Because we're the cool guys and you aren't, that's the difference.

[–]grassfed 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mm

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

It's all subject to the whims of those in charge. I got s/thatsretarded taken off s/all, even though it's about people doing retarded things, not making fun of Downs.

[–]NuclearBadger 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I've actually seen worse on daytime tv.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Thank you for sharing s/idfuckher with me, I too take pleasure in pictures of hotties 🙏

[–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Coomer

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

😯

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Rename it /s/IdDoThat and feature women, men, trans, stunts, and DIY projects.