use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
Present and discuss evidence showing that the US Government's version of the events of 9/11 cannot possibly be true. Submissions or comments supporting the official version, including links to sites purporting to "debunk" the 9/11 Truth Movement (depending on context), are considered off-topic here.
BOLLYN BOOKS:
by Christopher Bollyn
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed The World [PDF]
● Solving 9-11: The Deception That Changed the World (Abridged)
● Solving 9-11: The Original Articles
● The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East
● More on Issuu
CORBETT REPORT:
by James Corbett
● 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money
● 9/11 War Games
● 9/11 Whistleblowers
DOCUMENTARIES:
● 9/11 A New Standard For Deception by Kevin Ryan
● 9/11 From Cheney to Mossad
● 9/11: Intercepted
● 9/11 Ripple Effect
● Christopher Bollyn: Making Sense of the War on Terror by Ed Mays
● Loose Change (2nd Edition)
● The 9/11 Masterpiece Christopher Bollyn
● The New American Century
● The New Pearl Harbor Full 9/11 Documentary
● War Is Always By Deception
● Zero An Investigation Into 9-11
RESOURCES:
AE911Truth/UAF WTC7 Study Data:
● AE911Truth.org/wtc7
● ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
The 911Dataset Project:
● Archive.org : 911DataSets.org
● WebCitation.org : 911DataSets.org
Other:
● Truther Top 20 Counter Points To The Official 9/11 Story
Ask to co-mod or earn an invite.
CSS and banner images by /u/JasonCarswell
WTC7: "Dangerous fuel generator pumped diesel fuel throughout the building, against fire-code and insurance company request", "Directly lead to aggravation of fire damage and collapse of the building"
submitted 5 years ago * by Vigte from self.911truth
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago* (5 children)
A couple of problems with a liquid fuel theory:
The proposed theory is implausible. (This isn't a criticism of you Vigte.)
Edit:. Does anyone think that this looks like a burning building that collapsed as a result of a fuel fire?
[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (4 children)
I agree, there was no "explosion" involving fire in WTC7, so this theory doesn't make sense. Kind of disappointed it's getting so many upvotes when it so obviously is wrong
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (3 children)
I doubt most actually processed the title. Also, Vigte's generally have substance, so they probably didn't scrutinize the title.
I also noticed that in recent videos the is more smoke from the twin towers than I recalled. Do you have any archived that you could compare the ones in the link? I suppose the towers did smolder for 3 months, but I recall the smoke looking a bit different. I'll look into it, as well.
Tomorrow is the inverse 1/11/19.
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (2 children)
I do remember the twin towers smoking a ton, I don't think that's changed. I do have an original VHS tape I recorded of 9/11 from the news the day it happened though, I might have to break that out some day lol
I think you're right about the title, people just saw Vigte and WTC7 and upvoted
[–]Vigte[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (1 child)
We will just have to wait and see. Overlord said the files wouldn't make sense until the end.
For now all we have is scattered pieces of an investigation.
The documents say that is what the insurance company blamed WTC7 on. Could be their version of "find an excuse" - but the anhydrous coolant system was known before docu-drops, the insurance company's findings seem to back up the 9/11 truth "guess" regarding the coolant being a major factor. Could be the system itself was used as a bomb, seems more than likely.
Never did I said "I believe it was fire and fire alone" - I was merely copying the wording of the documents.
[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
Eh I think that Overlord stuff is a limited hangout by the CIA potentially. It's theater. I don't think we're going to learn anything new from some papers getting released (that could've been massively edited in the last 18 years).
I think what we know now is about as good as it's going to get, unfortunately. But it's interesting to dig in to, I guess. There's just so much active disinfo about it
view the rest of the comments →
[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun - (5 children)
[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun - (4 children)
[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]Vigte[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)