This 5-Minute Intro to SEVEN, the Documentary on Building 7 Collapse, to Run on 200 PBS Stations Nationwide over 3 months.

Carnate · 2020-06-12T07:55:24+00:00

I am also one of the nine. Screw eleven! Bring back oneteen.

beermeem · 2020-06-12T02:52:17+00:00

I've decided to become a 9/11-denier. It never happened.

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-06-12T02:17:46+00:00

Assuming this is true: it will be interesting to see how they spin the media manipulation of 9/11.

Will the public find out about the major role that Israel played?

Or the FBI? Or the courts?

They're probably intending to use the 9/11 false flag evidence to accelerate a civil war in the US; assuming it's true and they actually run it on PBS.

I wonder if they'll broadcast this during plandemic scamdemic #2...?

zyxzevn · 2020-05-24T17:53:55+00:00

I put it up here as comparison.
Notice how it does NOT collapse in freefall into its own footprint.
During to this accident 7 people died.

danuker · 2020-05-21T21:43:04+00:00

A gallon of roughly jet fuel (gasoline) (1) can drive roughly a ton of metal (your car) roughly 30 miles (2).

2 WTCs weighed roughly 1M tons (3). So, the equivalent energy of one gallon would move them at most a millionth of a car's MPG, or 30 / 1M = 3*10^-5 miles, or about 2 inches.

But of course, a "jet crashing into a building" is not a very efficient automobile. So, lots of that energy ends up as heat instead of just motion - which is why you need 10k gallons instead of just one. Heat which might, say, melt steel beams.

TL;DR: Inconclusive. I won't waste any more time on this.

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-05-16T20:20:57+00:00

IDK.

This link works.

https://153news.net/watch_video.php?v=N9SX192GRB68

Jesus · 2020-05-16T20:02:56+00:00

Video does not exist???

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-05-16T04:54:52+00:00

Regardless. Truth, or bust.

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-05-16T04:54:21+00:00

Yeah, it doesn't look good.

I doubt too many lawyers will be interested in visiting wrongly imprisoned Americans is allegedly "infected" FEMA camp.

PecosinRat · 2020-05-16T02:13:39+00:00

If that is true, the more important that we get the truth spread as widely as possible as soon as possible. History suggests that accepting a concentration camp fate doesn't really work out well.

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-05-15T23:25:37+00:00

The FEMA camps is where they'd like us to go... :-/

Wesborlandisagod5 · 2020-04-28T03:25:47+00:00

Crazy video!

JasonCarswell · 2020-04-27T20:48:23+00:00

Discovered via:
/s/PoliticalAnalysis/comments/423f/bin_laden_wanted_biden_trump_threatens_iran/

JasonCarswell · 2020-04-27T20:48:01+00:00

The full show:
/s/PoliticalAnalysis/comments/423f/bin_laden_wanted_biden_trump_threatens_iran/

JasonCarswell · 2020-04-27T20:47:45+00:00

The full show:
/s/PoliticalAnalysis/comments/423f/bin_laden_wanted_biden_trump_threatens_iran/

JasonCarswell · 2020-04-23T05:46:28+00:00

Shame.

JasonCarswell · 2020-04-22T21:41:15+00:00

Creator of the “Loose Change” series.

https://IAmDylanAvery.com

SEVEN Official Teaser (2020) | World Trade Center Building 7 (2:00) ~ AE911Truth, 2020-04-17

I was unsubbed from the AE911Truth channel and their 1,103 videos. Curious.

Also, for your amusement, a hack attack:

Dylan Avery and the death of the 911 Truth Movement (7:40) ~ cjnewson88, 2011-11-03 ▲138 ▼199

Robin · 2020-04-11T13:06:40+00:00

Why not post videos to somewhere else?

Jesus · 2020-04-01T00:55:12+00:00

They're still in power; it's the state, Trump, and the Likudniks as well as the ZioCons (Neoconservative Zionists in the US.)

We must drain the swamp to permit knew 9/11 orchestrators into the Trump administration.

That's basically the Republican slogan at this point.

Republicans are braindead at this point, and so aren't democrats.

Jesus · 2020-04-01T00:28:35+00:00

Look up Jerome Hauer and his connections to WTC7 and the Anthrax attacks. Graeme MacQueen wrote an interesting article on him.

Hauer is a Zionist and Neocon. He also participated in Operation Darkwinter, with Judith Miller and James Woolsey. Darkwinter was a biological weapons drill where anthrax was one of the weapons being used. Odd, considering Miller pretended to be a journalist in the drill when in real life she works for the NYT's and co-wrote the bentonite article implicating Iraq in the anthrax attacks when no bentonite was found, instead it being tin-wrapped which is seen only in the US, Israel, Germany and Russia. She also wrote a book, with co-author William Broad on bioweapons, particularly the fear that Iraq would use anthrax against the US, they were the same authors who shilled the false bentonite claims. Convenient that a book on the very subject they would shill after 9/11 would be published just before 9/11.

Of course the book was NY Times beat seller. Then you have Robert Kagan's father, Don and himself on the day of 9/11 in a think tank podcast interview state that the US better get ready because Iraq and Al Qaeda have anthrax.

Nobody knew this except these criminals, and theyy gloated about what would transpire and then propagandized their preconceived narrative.

NOT ONLY THAT. Miller would then, get Anthrax sent to her office at the NYT's. So, she played the part of a journalist in Dark Winter where Iraq and rouge states would use anthrax and other biological weapons on the media, only to then be the one who was sent a fake envelope of anthrax as a death threat, which she could then conveniently blame on Iraq and did.

Not to mention the only people actually targeted with REAL ANTHRAX were two democratic congressmen who refused to sign the Patriot Act into law.

Woolsey, another parcipant in Operation Dark Winter, former CIA and staunch neoconservative Zionist was also a PNAC signee.

As for Hauer...

You cannot make this shit up!

Hauer, supposedly an expert on bioterrorism was also the director of the OEM until 2000. The OEM had been located in a bunker on the 23rd floor of WTC7. This is where Hauer worked.

A NYT's article on July 27th, 1999 states that when Hauer was 15, his mother helped him get a job at the hospital morgue.

...cutting open the gut and cleaning it and pinning it and making it ready for the pathologist review."

The Times author said that Hauer:

Loves guts...viscera, innards, the stuff things are made of.

And how does this connect to WTC7?

The article goes on and states that Hauer graduated from actual human guts, to the innards of building structures...wink, wink.

And if that's not enough...

The article continues:

Hauer had an obsession for building collapse. He collected samples from evry building collapse he could find in New York.

His WTC7 bunker was suppose to be the command center for response to terrorism. But it was abondomed on 9/11 and with the two towers, WTC7 collapsed at free-fall speed.

Hauer would be interviewed by Dan Rather on September 11th. Saying the weakening of thr structure surprised many.

[He had heard concerns about] the structural stability of the building.

They are untouchable these mirderous criminals. To them thr end justifyies the means, hence why the gloat about it.

JasonCarswell · 2020-03-31T21:07:17+00:00

I forgot the question.

magnora7 · 2020-03-31T20:21:30+00:00

I wonder what percentage of Americans have heard of Building 7 and know it also fell down that day. I'd guess like 20-40%

I wonder how many also know building 7 had all the evidence for the trial for the $2.3 trillion the pentagon announced "missing" the day prior. And then the exact part of the pentagon that got hit on 9/11 killed several people who were set to testify about the trillions of dollars missing. What a coincidence.

d3rr · 2020-03-31T18:56:22+00:00

yes $$$

AirSeddit88 · 2020-03-28T05:26:50+00:00

Heroes!

Robin · 2020-03-27T18:37:18+00:00

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/WTC7/Destruction

la_cues · 2020-03-27T02:36:34+00:00

Awesome, glad we're finally settled with that one.

Claps dust off hands

zyxzevn · 2020-03-27T01:21:57+00:00

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 truth just released this video:
University of Alaska Fairbanks WTC 7 Final Report | Presented by Richard Gage AIA & Roland Angle PE

Jesus · 2020-03-21T18:06:54+00:00

It blew up its core.

Robin · 2020-03-18T04:45:18+00:00

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Daniel_Lewin

PecosinRat · 2020-03-18T03:18:08+00:00

This page is quite interesting. The very short video points out the obvious, "Where is all the material that was supposed to have crushed a hole in the middle of building six?"

JasonCarswell · 2020-03-11T09:13:52+00:00

I mean, after all, it's only the fundamental foundations of the GLOBAL WAR OF TERROR.

Who could it hurt?

Why question?

JasonCarswell · 2020-03-11T09:07:44+00:00

lololololol

The "scientific community" is actually a scientism community, otherwise they'd preach and practice open-science, aka "normal" science.

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-03-10T22:16:54+00:00

This is an interesting article. The reality is that academics don't want the factual truth.

Hard truths are obstacles to grant funding. These guys don't want to rock the political boat.

zyxzevn · 2020-03-10T18:23:39+00:00

Scientific article gets very hostile reactions.
It is clear that the scientific community is not able to do normal science.

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-02-21T12:56:00+00:00

It would seem so.

Another flawed source... :-/

Jesus · 2020-02-18T02:45:33+00:00

Tarpley is an EIR shill. EIR promotes the mythological Lincoln and Greenbacks.

Jesus · 2020-02-13T18:27:56+00:00

Good Post, these people are vile machiavellians.

Tom_Bombadil · 2020-02-07T15:19:31+00:00

Diplomudge? That hurts my feelings... :-p

I don't see evidence for actual terrorists.

Also, it's extremely difficult for large jets to maneuver with accuracy at 500 mph through the air a couple of hundred of feet above sea level, because if the increased air density. It's full throttle.

Plus there no good reason to go that fast even if they're remote piloted, because they "flew" in at a slight curve and it's easy to miss at 500mph speed. Keep in mind that any time the wings aren't flat that the plane is somewhat dropping in elevation.

They did hit the bullseye. The bullseye. TWICE
Exactly on the floors with the servers (to many details to go into), etc.
WTC 1 was 1,368 feet tall. So 1,368 feet / 110 floors = 12.4 ft per floor. IIRC they had 3 floors to hit, so they had to center corrcectly with an angled wing. Centering perfectly for impact on 1 floor with an angled aircraft is a tiny target if you're flying at 500 mph. Given this reality, I don't see that they really would have had a choice but to fake it. Too much was at stake.

Would they risk hitting the wrong location(s)? ~~No.~~ You tell me... ?

Also, the "how" doesn't matter as much as the "who" and "why".

It the public sees this more often and started asking questions, then there are so many additional facts that are suspicious beyond reason (WTC 7, etc.) that there's no turning back.

The objection I always had was the use of the word "hologram". CGI is not a hologram. That was probably part of the real disinfo.

I'll circle around and update this response in an hour or so, because IMO there are additional factors that are important to consider.

Crucially the "who" and "why" are the most important questions, which aren't included here.

Who: American and Israeli Zionists (Christian and Jewish, both).

Christopher Bollyn: Solving 9-11, The Deception That Changed The World

Why:

The Greater Israel Project = Middle East land grabs for Isreal, (Eretz Israel HaShlema / Greater Israel
Military industrial congressional complex (should be named this) profits
police state spying programs in the US, and globally for Population control.
Many others, but I'm out of time.

Edit: a bit of this and that

useless_aether · 2020-02-07T07:08:12+00:00

i also tend to think this is the case. it just makes sense from the perspective of the conspirators: make it a normal demolition (well, use nanothermite on the beams, but still) and just use the media with crisis actors to propagate the planes with evil terrorists narrative. they followed the keep it simple stupid principle - the less things to go wrong, the better. and this is why no fighter interceptors were scrambled, because the pilots would see the truth; that there are no planes.

when there were no planes in shanksville and at the pentagon, why would there be any at the wtc?

Jesus · 2020-02-07T04:22:29+00:00

Nah, Alice Hoagland and the flight manifests say otherwise. Read Elias Davidsson's book, called Hijacking America's mind. If anything else, the planes were drones painted to look like passenger jets, exactly the same as the ones that allegedly departed that day, though two did not. Operation Northwoods, with mock vicsims and aliases seems far more likely based on the research of a few passengers that are alive with aliases who now are millionaires.

Besides the pilots would know something is going on. It is CLEAR on radar that the planes switched their transponders with drones. That and two planes flew straight over the first privatized airport Stewart International Airport north of New York City. They most likely landed there, very much what Operation Northwoods said would happen.

magnora7 · 2020-02-07T03:54:42+00:00

I think they just remote-piloted real planes with real people, that capability exists (fly-by-wire), and I don't see why they wouldn't just do that. More trauma = more control. There's no reason to over-complicate things.

Jesus · 2020-02-07T03:53:00+00:00

The Nuke theory is clearly disinformation. The Drone theory is the most reasonable theory in my mind, and makes the most sense, but then we must ask the question, if the buildings were demolished how could they fly planes into the facades and not doslodge the detcord? It would be a no, no in top down demolitions which is clearly visible

This video is at least interesting:

https://ia800802.us.archive.org/30/items/OrlandoShootingHoaxAngelColonDoctorsFullPressConference/noplanetheoryuglyamericans.mp4

magnora7 · 2020-02-07T00:39:39+00:00

You're promoting no nukes and now CGI planes? lol man.... you're eating up the disinfo stories lately huh. Too bad. These are TAVISTOCK disinformation narratives that distract from reality and discredit real discussions about these topics.

PecosinRat · 2020-01-21T17:39:22+00:00

The obvious candidates for actual responsibility for what happened on 9/11, Bush etal., can't have been the primary movers. Remember that Cheney avoided the draft for Vietnam and Bush was AWOL. These two people don't have the necessary guts to be more than administrators. There must be a person (more likely, "persons") who bankrolled the operation and provided the necessary leadership. While exposing the guilty is extremely important, it is much more important that the knowledge that this was a false flag makes it into the public's understanding of this event. We can't undo 9/11, but if people's first reaction to future extraordinary events is "That must be a false flag" then the usefulness of this tool to manipulate the public will be extremely diminished.

Jesus · 2020-01-18T02:28:42+00:00

DUCKDUCKGO: Rebekah ROth controlled opposition "letsrollforums." I already sort of knew Betsy was a shill because she shilled Judy Wood and then with her recent video, it becomes even more obvious. They will for years ive you all this truth mixed with some lies and slowly lead you astray or back to theright-left paradigm.

David Ray Griffin and Graeme MacQueen are people I would look into if you want to research 9/11. There books and articles are well researched.

Jesus · 2020-01-17T22:14:59+00:00

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NkV1MXkQM84

^ ^ ^ That's the video where she does a complete 180. What is clear, is she was a shill from the very beginning but gave you 90% truth with lies. Fortunately, you were able to learn from her content, for instance, her Carlos Boston Bombing video. That video was a relentless expose on the Boston Bombing fakery and the actors hired by DHS to play patriotic parts in the script. Carlos would have been deported for vandalizing government property (setting fire to a government vehicle) if he had not participated in the event. And he makes that very clear in a few interviews in 2011, when he plainly states that in the hospital men in black suits from DHS were able to talk him into a deal, so that he would not be deported, what that deal entails, we do not know, but years later he would be hailed a hero by the media for helping Jeff Bauman in the alleged Boston Bombing, when in reality raw footage illustrates that Carlos was wiping fake blood on his American flag for 10 minutes to be used for propaganda purposes.

A great expose, but then she pushes the Judy Wood theories, which I personally do not prescribe to. And the video linked above illustrates she is a shill pushing the left-right paradigm.

As for Mrs. Roth. She also is a shill, look up Letsrollforums, she was hired during the Sunstein's cognitive infiltration program and has direct ties to the CIA. Plus, she says all of her books a fiction.

You must understand that shills with fought with other shills to Balkanize movements, ideas and beliefs. Infighting is almost always theater, even if there are truths told within the infighting.

Some of the comments which question her latest video:

Get out and vote lol. Coming from a person who used to make videos exposing just how staged and phony our government is. Anyone that thinks Trump is some sort of white knight against corruption has got to be either a bit naive or outright ignorant. Or they’re a shill haha. He’s just another phony actor in a rigged reality tv show.

useless_aether · 2020-01-17T21:29:56+00:00

and here is she attacking rebekah roth https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3vLH7yAkAKM&list=PLKUIVt86OSPRdQnsW4NWS1XEbReQ2YTnp&index=9&t=0s

so rebekah might not be a fraud then !

useless_aether · 2020-01-17T21:09:06+00:00

found her - betsy mcgee (real name?). promoting judy wood (someone should tell her about thermite :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fu79qANjt0M&list=PLKUIVt86OSPRdQnsW4NWS1XEbReQ2YTnp

Jesus · 2020-01-17T19:35:18+00:00

She might be on bitchute, she goes under conspiracytheorista, and another name. I was flabbergasted with a recent video she made in 2016, unless it was fake, but in the comments she assured confused listeners it was not. She shilles the republican Zionist line and was a staunch proponent of Trump. It was actually quite revealing. I'll try to find the video for you.

useless_aether · 2020-01-17T10:07:58+00:00

i couldn't find her channel on yt

useless_aether · 2020-01-17T10:06:25+00:00

https://www.history.com/news/9-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-pentagon

useless_aether · 2020-01-17T05:28:34+00:00

way cool, thank you. i am putting it in the sidebar

useless_aether · 2020-01-02T23:19:19+00:00

this is how it looks like when history is being rewritten. the new generation of adults was born after 911 and have no personal experience about the truth other than what the msm and the education system is providing.

this is why r/911truth is quarantined too - so tptb can create a new, deceptive reality without interference for the young minds.. so they serve the system well.. imo, this guy, dawson is co-opted for this cause.

nothing on rationalwiki and wikispooks, but i found this:

https://canarymission.org/individual/Ryan_Dawson

strong antisemite views.

Jesus · 2019-12-21T22:59:51+00:00

SEARCH: Apocalypse YouTUeb Channel and then 9/11 Predictive Programming. It is a 55min long video of 9/11 predictive programming, the best compilation ever created.

Jesus · 2019-12-21T22:59:01+00:00

The clock isn't on 9/11 but everything else is true. Though this is one of thousands of predictive programming before 9/11, many more overt than this one.

Jesus · 2019-12-21T22:58:06+00:00

Useless_Aether: Great video you posted. This women, however, is a shill. 90% truth 10% disinfo. I followed her for years. She put out awesome stuff, espeically on the Boston Bombing and 9/11 when it came to David Rockefeller. But go and watch her current videos. She literally, did a 180. An overt, obvious 180 and now shills for Trump and the left-right paradigm and pushes the disinfo theories of Dr. Judy Wood. Peace.

zyxzevn · 2019-12-21T14:48:48+00:00

Should say: "Majority of US population knows the US government is concealing what they know about 9/11. "

But sadly we have these pseudo-sceptics that are parrots for the US propaganda.

magnora7 · 2019-12-20T22:11:20+00:00

Yeah Dov Zakhiem and George Bush are still around to answer questions though.

useless_aether · 2019-12-20T22:09:35+00:00

with david rockefeller and hw bush being dead already, and i expect, soon cheney will follow - then the rest can just blame everything on them. like what the nazis did at the nuremberg trials.

magnora7 · 2019-12-20T21:35:01+00:00

There's no benefit to anyone in power, to deviate from the lie they've committed to. So it's not going to happen. We should stop looking to our government for answers as well, because they clearly often don't have our best interests in mind.

useless_aether · 2019-12-18T16:44:34+00:00

1998

"We welcomed the new $20 bill with open arms. Larger and off-center portrait, watermarks galore, and more, including a north-side view of the White House."

https://www.thrillist.com/home/a-photo-history-of-the-evolution-of-the-20-dollar-bill

https://money.cnn.com/1998/09/24/economy/bill/

useless_aether · 2019-12-18T16:37:01+00:00

https://archive.is/uFwbI

useless_aether · 2019-12-18T16:33:28+00:00

David Rockefeller, the financier of the World Trade Center, was featured on the cover of Newsweek, with his watch hands pointing exactly to 9 and 11.

http://imgur.com/a/Bk27R

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

-David Rockefeller: 2002 autobiography "Memoirs"

One World Trade Center replaced his Twin Towers.

911 became the national emergency number, in 1968, nationalized in 1973.

https://www.nena.org/?page=911overviewfacts

The Twin Tower's construction began in 1968, finalized in 1973.

https://www.wtc.com/about/history

The New York Times showed an illustration of the Twin Towers, with an airplane about to crash into the north face of the North Tower, above the 90th floor, in 1968, 33 years before it happened.

http://www.nytimes.com/ref/magazine/08wtc-timeline.html

https://imgur.com/deMdo7L

The Pentagon's construction began on September 11th, 1941.

http://www.history.com/news/9-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-pentagon

https://archive.is/uFwbI

useless_aether · 2019-12-17T22:19:20+00:00

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=-Gf9_GKQsCM

useless_aether · 2019-11-04T05:18:06+00:00

and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9kEwQud4Ek

raven9 · 2019-10-22T09:07:02+00:00

The steel core strcture was integral. The floor trusses were suspended between it and the perimeter steel structure.

CompleteDoubterII · 2019-10-06T18:32:14+00:00

I'm not convinced this means much.

thefadd · 2019-10-02T02:33:48+00:00

All of the evidence is compelling. I've seen all the videos and photos a million times. Even the one of the guy masturbating to the planes flying into the Twin Towers.

The thing I miss most about the end of regretsy was all the homemade 9/11 memorial kitsch.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-10-01T17:56:26+00:00

How about the video link of the Israeli "art students" who installed the explosives?

Did you happen to take a look at that video? The evidence is compelling.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-10-01T17:37:19+00:00

Something.

thefadd · 2019-10-01T03:13:39+00:00

Who gives a shit. I have no interest in "proving" shit to you? What makes me care what you think? I'm here for you not me. Don't be a jerk.

thefadd · 2019-10-01T03:12:09+00:00

Yes, that is what the images I saw of the "sliced" steel girders was supposed to "prove" -- that charges were placed in specific places to create a foot print demolition. I don't know how many footprint demolitions you have ever seen but they all clearly look exactly the same.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-30T20:25:39+00:00

We can agree that the fire argument holds no water.

The external walls collapsed under the pressure of the explosives that were placed and detonated in the buildings.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-30T20:19:41+00:00

You've stated that you're not willing to provide evidence, and your disinfo is a red herring.

Feel free to support your claims, by providing some evidence.

thefadd · 2019-09-30T17:47:56+00:00

My “disinfo” supports your narrative. What a bunch of paranoid O’Briens on this site.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-30T11:12:48+00:00

Source?

Edit: FYI - This spray foam can resist shotgun blasts. It is quite resilient.

Timmy · 2019-09-30T02:52:54+00:00

The original design called for concrete, not spray foam which can flake off.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T19:42:34+00:00

You're the man! :-)

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T19:15:00+00:00

Chomsky is also accessable, but he's 100% disinfo when it comes to 9/11 Truth.

Similarly, Chomsky is also not a goy.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T19:11:28+00:00

Source? I'm curious where your disinfo comes from.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T19:10:07+00:00

Good.

No one is interested in your disinfo.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T19:07:52+00:00

Insulating spray foam protects steel during fires.

Kevin Ryan confirmed this at UL, which contradicted/debunked the first official story.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T19:03:59+00:00

This is correct.

Concrete performs poorly under tension. Steel reinforcement is added to improve it's tensile performance.

This can be a problem for structural longevity. The water which is trapped in concrete will eventually rust the steel. Steel expands when it rusts, and applies tensile forces to the concrete, and damages it from within.

So, I doubt that the support columns were encased in steel. The architects/engineers would easily identify this failure mode, and
Unless it was intentionally designed in (which is unlikely).

The concrete foundation is almost certainly reinforced concrete, as it should only see compression force.

fred_red_beans · 2019-09-29T17:30:12+00:00

185,101 tons of structural steel were removed from ground zero.

The steel removed was treated like garbage, not crucial evidence.

From 9-11 Research, which is not A&E:

https://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/arch/core.html

Each tower was supported by a structural core extending from its bedrock foundation to its roof. The cores were rectangular pillars with numerous large columns and girders, measuring 87 feet by 133 feet.

The core structures, like the perimeter wall structures, were 100 percent steel-framed.

Blueprints:

https://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/plans/frames.html

HeyImSancho · 2019-09-29T15:33:42+00:00

Gage is very accessible. He lives, or has a home in North Idaho, and invites people over to his house for discussions. I've got a friend that regularly went, and invited me.

Not saying anything about the man, other than at least he's accessible; which I'd guess if he was in to shillary, he wouldn't be quite that easily accessed on a regular weekly meeting night.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T15:08:57+00:00

Wrong again.

Citing the reports reveals you as a shill.

bobbobbybob · 2019-09-29T13:03:40+00:00

concrete is great in compression. Vertical structural integrity is concrete's forte.

Timmy · 2019-09-29T12:20:19+00:00

The towers were not built following the original designs. A spray on foam was used instead of concrete over the beams. Chesp redesign right from the start. Built to fail.

Timmy · 2019-09-29T12:18:35+00:00

The core towers were steel with a cheapass spray on insualtion, instead of the originally designed thick materials. It wasn't bult to last, but to become a future ghetto.

thefadd · 2019-09-29T11:41:32+00:00

There are no “core columns.” The core has nothing to do with how those buildings keep themselves up. Steel buildings are built using exoskeletons propped from outside.

The buildings’ external walls collapsed. Otherwise, the collapse would have looked differently. That’s why the fire argument holds no water.

thefadd · 2019-09-29T11:38:20+00:00

Typically, in construction, one would wrap steel in concrete. But the concrete isn’t for vertical structural integrity. Just because concrete is used in construction doesn’t mean the buildings weren’t nearly identical to every other steel building ever constructed that never collapsed. It’s in the reports.

This is very basic level logic and honestly a bizarre question.

thefadd · 2019-09-29T11:35:02+00:00

I’ve seen photos of what are supposed sliced or detonated steel columns from the twin powers. I’m not going to look for them for you.

Ian · 2019-09-29T11:07:14+00:00

This. And rather the "cheap steel"-con if it comes to structural conspiracies.

Still, it's a longer stretch than bombs for me.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-29T05:15:50+00:00

Do you have any photos of a reinforces concrete core. I think they're referring to the base structure of the building with this reference.

The main supporting columns are steel, and the outter walls were to. They had to control demo this building, and blow up each floor from the inside, because the outside wasb comprised of steel plates that were bolted together.

The two towers were literally encased in steel plates. Armored.

I'm also suspicious about A&E for not naming names.

Some like Kevin Ryan are legit. He even wrote a book called "another 19" where he identifies real suspects, instead of the fake Muslim Patsy's.

d3rr · 2019-09-29T03:39:30+00:00

I think 100% steel

https://cdn.historydaily.org/content/52789/412056c116e0a260c4099227f5a88c45.jpg

https://cdn.historydaily.org/content/52789/ed05520a5d4a1f3a2ea2953808c500a6.jpg

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-28T15:50:52+00:00

Larry Silverstein: WTC 7 "Pull It" from 2002 Interview

hennaojisan · 2019-09-28T05:24:30+00:00

Referring to United Airlines Flight 93, Rumsfeld famously said, "...the plane that was shot down in Pennsylvania...uh the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania..." Soon after Rumsfeld misspoke, he resigned to spend more time with his family. Note that Wiki sticks tightly to the official story and at some points even embellishes it. 😂

d3rr · 2019-09-27T23:57:05+00:00

There's a recounting of Rumsfeld supposedly knowing nothing about building 7 in an interview, very interesting.

Tom_Bombadil · 2019-09-14T06:24:19+00:00

The crash site is ridiculous. No planes. Nothing. No one who was on-site was fooled.

Jesus · 2019-09-14T05:55:01+00:00

I do too. They simply blew up a small hole into an abandoned mine and said, hey look this is where UA93 crashed. I believe they planned this crash, as the patriotic, feel good narrative years in advance. They didn't do a great job at it though.

What is even more revealing is that the hole has a scar that the media and goverment said was where the plane wings hit. Indeed, It looks like plane wings hit the geound creating a long SCAR IN THE EARTH. The problem with this narrative is that NASA earth imagery shows that in 1994 this scar was already there. Which means they picked this location for this marrative well in advance.

911truth

MODERATORS

As for Hauer...

And how does this connect to WTC7?