Melodic programmer IRL by gloomy_bear in whatever

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I'm doing great, what about you? (Sorry for the delay, it's clownflare's fault.)

Tell me oh SAIDit! wise and noble ones. Why has the SAIDit! canary died and gone away? by relative in SaidIt

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is one of the reasons why I hang out on https://matrix.gvid.tv instead now.

On average, a man has less than one penis by RedditButt in ShowerThoughts

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How does this subject even devolve into politics? You didn't talk about gender identity. You talked about the physical male organ. Do people argue that many trannies just have an imaginary penis?

Edit: I read "man" in the archaic sense of referring to both men and women. I don't really see the point of your post otherwise, because it'd be marginally lower than 100%.

Tiktok was banned because jews don't have control over it by Oyveygoyim in whatever

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Rothschilds who set up Israhell and the other zionists don't follow the religion either. Meanwhile there are many Orthodox jews who likewise oppose the modern state of Israhell. You're by and large correct but it isn't the jewish religion that's the problem either.

A couple of arguments why 9/11 was an inside job, according to ChatGPT. by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

All of it is proof that adds up. The examples you listed are very credible and unlikely to be part of controlled opposition.

A couple of arguments why 9/11 was an inside job, according to ChatGPT. by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's another excellent example of this principle. Just look at how much better it is at answering after I limit its scope.

Holocaust Denial Arguments: Himmler's order on Dec. 28, 1942 to reduce the death rate in the camps as a priority. by HibikiBlack in ConspiracyTrace

[–]LarrySwinger2 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Stop calling it holocaust denial already. It's holocaust realism.

A couple of arguments why 9/11 was an inside job, according to ChatGPT. by LarrySwinger2 in conspiracy

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The point of this prompt isn't to reiterate what most of us here know. The point is this: if you simply ask ChatGPT whether or not 9/11 was an inside job, without specifying a source to focus on, it will give the mainstream narrative and use all the propaganda tactics to suppress the truth. When you tell it what source to focus on, that's where LLMs shine, they're very good at summarizing. That's why it's essential to know what original sources of information are. If a list of reliable sources can be compiled, then we can tell LLMs to only use those sources and use them for knowledge gathering.

When Do We Stop Finding New Music? by Drewski in music

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey, welcome back man! Been a while

ABC news edited one of their own articles from 2002 about Israeli intelligence operatives being arrested and detained on 9/11 to cut out the incriminating parts that show they were Mossad— this was done exactly 1 month before Oct. 7 (per Wayback Machine) by Questionable in conspiracy

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Check the August 16 version, that one likewise ends with "our purpose was to document the event". They removed 3/4th of the content since then, and the first version to reflect that is from 9 September. They doctored it around one month before the attack, apparently in preparation, is his point.

Do these count as shallow boobs? Trying to get a feel for this. by LarrySwinger2 in Shallowbooblove

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No. In Yu-Gi-Oh! you change the cards between attack and defense position which involves light touching.

Do these count as shallow boobs? Trying to get a feel for this. by LarrySwinger2 in Shallowbooblove

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They're Yu-Gi-Oh! cards.