you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RedditButt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm comparing a month before Oct 7: https://web.archive.org/web/20230909120733/https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1

to the current article: https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1

I couldn't spot anything different.

Even the earliest snapshot here seems to be the same: https://web.archive.org/web/20070320190627/https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885&page=1 (It is separated into 4 pages you have to click through)

What could I be missing, here? Nothing seems maliciously altered.

[–]LarrySwinger2 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Check the August 16 version, that one likewise ends with "our purpose was to document the event". They removed 3/4th of the content since then, and the first version to reflect that is from 9 September. They doctored it around one month before the attack, apparently in preparation, is his point.