Joe Biden is personally responsible for yet another American woman's death

submitted by iamonlyoneman from (themidwesterner.news)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

1) I didn't say that, quit putting words in my mouth. 2) Because the police are at the city and state level, Customs and Border Patrol are at the federal level.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

1) You said the 2750 lives saved last year, which you attribute to the price of bullets, is the responsibility of the police.

Can you explain how that isn't saying that the price of bullets is the responsibility of police?

2) You appear to be claiming that homicide is never the responsibility of federal law enforcement, and always state or city level law enforcement. That's not true.

[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

1) I said the police are not controlled by Biden and neither are bullet prices. However, with Bidenomics everything is 2X 3X cost.

2) Biden does not control the police, but the federal agents. This does not mean that homicide is never the responsibility of federal law enforcement. Quit adding words!

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

However, with Bidenomics everything is 2X 3X cost.

Which saved 2750 lives last year.

Biden does not control the police, but the federal agents.

Right. But we're taking about the 2750 people not murdered last year. So Biden is directly responsible for saving some of them?

This does not mean that homicide is never the responsibility of federal law enforcement. Quit adding words!

You claimed that the drop in homicides is not due to Biden because it is the responsibility of the police, because they're not federal.

So it very much looks like that was what you're saying. You're welcome to clarify your position. Saying "quit adding words" didn't do that.

[–]WoodyWoodPeckerHah he he he hah! 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You clearly didn't understand what I said. This debate can go no further if you are ignorant or playing games with me. If you are really centris you'd drop the black and white thinking and use shades of gray instead,

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You clearly didn't understand what I said.

Did you say that "with Bidenomics everything is 2X 3X cost", and "homicides are down because of the price of bullet"?

If you are really centris you'd drop the black and white thinking and use shades of gray instead

What aspect of my thinking is black and white? What would gray be in that case?