you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]passionflounderPaper tiger[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Quite correct.

The fact that the "fraud" was in fact common practice in the process of applying for loan and it's the lender's responsibility to do due diligence via assessment to confirm the stated value and when appropriate, adjust.

The loan was granted and paid off... NO victim of the alleged fraud.

This was the deployment of a weaponized justice system against a political enemy. This confirms that there is no equal protection under the law by the precedent set with this.

If it is allowed to stand, it will be repeated and expanded. Who will be the next enemy of the State?

[–]GuyWhite 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nig York State also has gone after the NRA. I believe the NRA moved their incorporation to Texas