Why does a rabbi own PornHub?

submitted by Oyveygoyim from ancestralvril.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]no_u 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

He's also a lawyer, NRA advocate and general scumbag, as are many Christo-fascists. Asshole hypocrite corporate ownership isn't news.

This is news: Pornhub’s Parent Company Admits to Profiting From Sex Trafficking

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/21/nyregion/pornhub-aylo-profits-sex-trafficking.html

[–]x0x7 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

What's wrong with being an NRA advocate?

[–]no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Powerful lobby and investors responsible for blocking reasonable gun laws one would see in almsot every other country other than the US, resulting increasing mass shootings over the past few decades and other forms of relatively preventable violence and bullying.

[–]MagicMike 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Any government that fears the people having guns should also fear the people having rope.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well said.

[–]no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Or you'd hide in the corner and cry like a baby it you had no gun, edgelord. People can obviously have guns. That's not the problem. Consider why the US differs from other countries re. gun laws.

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Guns are the greatest liberating force in history. Governments are reluctant to kick down doors if there’s a 12 gauge on the other side. It happens of course but only in extreme circumstances. When the foot meets the the door, the owner of the foot meets Jesus, and Jesus is pissed.

[–]no_u 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Another incredibly idiotic argument. It's all hat and no cattle. Makes as much sense as tits on a turtle.

There have been many ways in which people have obtained and maintained power. Reducing all of that to one type of gun is pathetic. Moreover, most everyone in the world can own a shotgun. Those in power have brainwashed you to think that a gun will benefit you in a significant manner. (It won't.)

[–]MagicMike 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

North Korea? China?

[–]send_nasty_stuff 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

resulting increasing mass shootings over the past few decades

Gun crime is on the rise in the west because there are fewer whites. Most gun crime is black on black violence. School shooting is up because it's in the globbalist controlled governments best interest to disarm the populace. The current strategy to disarm the public is to fake mass shootings or to trigger weak people into breaking down mentally and hoping that a certain percentage of them can be coerced to commit mass shootings. The average person thinks, "take the guns and then there's no more gun crime!" but that's obviously a seriously flawed logic if you understand anything about history and sovereignty.

[–]x0x7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is a strong case for increased school shootings being a product of anti-depressants.