Why are we not talking more about the congressional UFO hearing today? Shit was wild.

submitted by TitsAndWhiskey from m.youtube.com

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]sneako 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Because you are a faggot my good sir. Cease from the action of entering smelly dongs into your facial orifices and our salon will begin posthaste

[–]TitsAndWhiskey[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Man that incel cult got you good, huh?

[–]Musky 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I haven't watched it yet. I've read about it, sounds like more of the same that we've been hearing for decades.

I feel like this is partly a psyops campaign. Don't fuck with the USA, we have alien tech.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The difference between this and the likes of, say, Bob Lazar and company is that these three are vetted and venerated military veterans and government officials that we know were actually in a position to know this stuff.

The Area 51 PsyOps was supposedly to cover up testing of the stealth bomber. Those tests were carried out in clear space over one of the least populated areas of the time, and while the sightings were strange, they didn’t break the laws of physics as we know them.

Here we have an actual Air Force pilot testifying that they encountered these craft up close and personal, in broad daylight, off the coast of San Diego, during a training exercise that was supposed to have clear airspace. There are supposedly hundreds of eye witnesses, whose statements were all similar, backed by radar, video, and thermal data.

If the evidence can be reviewed and validated, it proves that technology exists that far outstrips our current understanding of the limits of physics.

But the problem is that the officials at every level suppress this information and make every attempt to keep it from reaching congress (and therefore the people of America).

It’s interesting because for two hours, the bulk of the conversation was around how to create appropriate channels for the information to be passed on for congressional oversight, and how to change the culture of silence.

In other words, it felt like any other bureaucratic meeting. Except for a few tidbits about alleged recovered craft and “non-human biological material” or descriptions of the “flying tic-tac,” it could’ve been a corporate SOX policy meeting or a Ways and Means committee meeting.

This isn’t PsyOps. We’re not saying we have the tech, we’re saying there is credible evidence that someone out there has the tech. It’s real, and it’s terrifying.

[–]Musky 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All of this is very interesting, it's just not very new. The quality and quantity of evidence has increased but these sightings go back decades, and by reliable eyewitnesses. Pilots have been seeing these things since people could fly. I already believed. I'm not seeing any revelations from these hearings from that perspective.

It's putting the cart before the horse, but for human space travel to be viable, there had to be a vastly better way to go about it than what we're doing currently. There has to be FTL, better than even what we have so far theorized. Space is too damn big to cruise around at even c. And these sightings validate that, as they ignore the laws of physics as we know them. In particular, for me, how they can transition from air to underwater without any noticeable detriment. Like it wasn't even water.

And if you accept that is possible, I think you can deduct other clues from the sightings. Like the shape of the craft, I don't think it's an accident there aren't any DeLorean shaped UFOs. If they're not designed for whimsy, why they need to be symmetrical along certain axises (based on descriptions of the crafts). I think that suggests a sort of polarity involved, possibly involving quantum spin. Although that subject rapidly gets complicated and quantum science is a little woo woo. It's a lot of guesses and I don't think anyone in the know pretends they got it all right.

Another clue would be the radioactivity detected at crash sites, along with no emissions from UFOs. There seems to be an entirely contained nuclear reaction of some sort. They aren't boiling water with a nuclear reactor. There is no waste heat. I think this suggests using nuclear energy directly to power the craft somehow.

Also, this might not be just an FTL engine, it might be able to move in time. These might not be aliens but future humans that have genetically engineered themselves to be unrecognizable as human.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lazar actually maintained that propulsion was achieved by controlling gravity, i.e. localized gravity wells. Which, given what we know (or believe) about physics, would imply the feasibility of FTL travel.

But Lazar was almost certainly completely full of shit. I’m generally a UFO skeptic, and I don’t really follow much of it.

To me, the most interesting and important thing is that it finally looks like these known phenomena are going to be openly investigated. And that’s heartening if for no other reason than to shine some light into the shadowy recesses of government (looking at you, DOD) that have operated for so long with such minimal oversight.

I don’t know. Maybe I’m an optimist. But it’s a step.

[–]Gaslov 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's bullshit which is why no one cares. It's the same ole shit from these clowns.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I disagree. Whether or not the actual claims are bullshit, the transparency that Congress is calling for from the shadowy sectors of the government based on these claims is HUGE.