all 6 comments

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's actually becoming untrue. "They" are starting to push things like "non-binary top surgery" so that wackjobs can select various mutilations "a la carte."

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It doesn't actually but ok boomer

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What the fuck doesn't do what? You sure you pushed the right button there, champ?

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There is a question posed in the image u/aaarrgh linked. The question has a false premise. I'll let you work out the rest of the answer to your question on your own.

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think I already did. My first post explained exactly what the false premise is.

[–]TheMaharishi 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just eat the female dicks before the zogbots throw you into re-education camps. Wouldn't surprise me if those camps had showers. Maybe even a catchy slogan like "Men are better at being women than women are at being men" ;-)