you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DirewolfGhost 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Well yeah, he was Jewish.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't get the whole Jewish-Communist thing. Jews are greedy hyper-capitalists that absolutely dominate capitalist economies in sectors like banking (moneychanging) mercantile (markets), and are the super rich owners of most of the important private capital. Jews have been very very successful at exploiting capitalism, and certainly aren't interested in economic equality or the masses in general. Yes Marx was of Jewish descent, but he wasn't a very good one, or even particularly religious, referring to religion as 'the opiate of the masses'. His academic contemporaries and influences were not other Jews, but Germans from the Young Hegelians

[–]DirewolfGhost 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Its because Jews do not love their god, they live in anxiety of their god, which is the same as living in anxiety of the world. Their god is (effectively) the material world. Communism is basically worship of the state as god and living in anxiety of the state is natural. The young Hegelians are accelerationists who believe the all consuming state is inevitable, which may yet prove to be true. Religions outside state worship would in fact be delusional to this truth, but perhaps a multipolar world, as putin and others are working towards, are more true in the long run. Check out "new discourses" and James Lindsay if you're interested in the subject. He's active on youtube and minds.

Its not causational but correlational. I hope that helps?

Its greater than Judaism and communism in the long run. Masculine republics give way to feminine democracies give way to dictatorships. As it has been as it always will be.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Its not causational but correlational. I hope that helps?

Not fully understanding, but I can see you are making a nuanced point and at least have some familiarity with the subject

Check out "new discourses" and James Lindsay if you're interested in the subject.

Wwasn't familiar with him, but he seems pretty interesting from a quick search. I don't disagree with some of the things I'm reading, and his satirical paper submissions are quite funny. Thanks, I do find this subject to be interesting, and will check out his "New Discourses"

[–]DirewolfGhost 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When different golf courses hit balls into the same pond (known as a hazard), they have to deal with the same issues. From an outside perspective, rich people who hit golf balls into the same pond become associated as the same group, whether they hit ball from the left hill or the right hill. They fail to the same traps.