Drag Queen show (with 20 children present) protected by Armed Antifa…

submitted by superglowie from citizenfreepress.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RamblingOtter 9 insightful - 4 fun9 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

if a parent is perverted in the head enough to allow their child to attend this event, then it's on them.

[–]Bonn1770 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

How much more time before they drop all pretenses and just put up a burning statue of Moloch and start chucking their children into the ovens?

[–]RamblingOtter 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I wouldn't give it too long at all. Most likely metaphorically but that scenario does seem quite a quick fix.

What this is doing is attempting to fuck kids up for life. It isn't good enough to shoot them in the face, what these people are looking to gain is actual destruction and disfigurement with life altering conditions, all designed to subvert a child's natural development.

And that's why these fuckers - and ANTIFA - can fuck right off.

[–]jet199Instigatrix 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Remember that these kids are intended to be the upper class so it's all about warping their ideas of what's acceptable to do to the rest of us.

[–]Bonn1770 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The slippery slope is real. They went from "we just want to have anal sex in the privacy of our homes" to "SACRIFICE YOUR CHILDREN FOR THE GREATER GLORY OF BAAL!" If they thought it could be socially acceptable in 2022 to cut six year olds in half and collect their blood in a stone basin they would do it. Hell they probably already are.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are abortions not human sacrifices already? Are hormone blockers not mutilation of children? How blatant do you think they will be with it?

[–]Bonn1770 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Abortions are the most evil of human sacrifices, a Satanic inversion of a mother's God given bond with her unborn child, murdering it in the most sacred of places, the womb. It does not get much worse than that, especially considering the doctor's role is another Satanic inversion: taking life instead of saving it, violating their oaths. Hell is real and these people are going there no questions.

They have been boiling the frog slowly as I've said before. Look how "normal" people are offering up their children to male pedophiles who are sexually aroused by wearing women's underwear. These are literally pedophile men with erections stripping for 8 year olds. I give it ten more years before they demand your children for rape and brainwashing or the troon platoon will will shoot your entire family. And remember, in ancient times if the Moloch worshipers who sacrificed their babies in the fire showed any sign of grief the rest of the family would join the baby in the oven, so you will be forced by law to celebrate all this crap. Like that Canadian father who was thrown in jail for misgendering his young son. And yes his wife is behind castrating his son and there is nothing he can do about it except vocally support the whole evil endeavor. And most heartbreaking, once all the damage is done to his son, castrated, sterilized, permanent damage from HRT, loss of IQ, no bone development, when his son detransitions and has not killed himself, his father will have to answer when his son asks, "why did you let them do this to me?"

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

So the parents who rape thier own kids should be left alone?

[–]RamblingOtter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Why would they be left alone?

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You tell me. Where is the line? You say we should look the other way as parents bring thier kids to this. This is clearly child sexual grooming. I don't see any obvious line between this and other sexual abuse. Why should they be left alone to do this?

[–]RamblingOtter 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

There is a line like it or not. I do not agree with parents taking their children to this sort of event at all. I would sooner have the event not take place as it targets children. But there is a certain point where either parents are raising the children or the State is.

Urging parents to make better decisions would be the more acceptable move, but given the parents themselves are from a very broken generation I don't see it happening. They are certainly of the generation that are very anti-authority and the most interested in causing as much destruction to the family unit as possible.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

There is a line like it or not

Where?

[–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Raping kids.

Taking a kid to a drag show isn't raping a kid. It's incredibly stupid. It's risky behavior that possibly opens up your kid up to abuse. But so is letting your kid confess to a priest.

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Taking a kid to a drag show isn't raping a kid

No, it certainly isn't. It is grooming them to behave sexually, to normalize risky behavior, and prime them to be easy targets for sexual abuse.

How do you define rape? Should we not do anything until there is penetration? Does it have to be a dick, or do fingers count?

Obviously molestation is ok. But what about child sex tapes? Is it ok if they are forced to masturbate on camera?

[–]Alienhunter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Legal rape or the general common sense definition?

Common sense definition, any sexual activity with a child is rape.

No, it certainly isn't. It is grooming them to behave sexually, to normalize risky behavior, and prime them to be easy targets for sexual abuse.

I completely agree which is why this is so troubling. But it's not yet crossed the legal line, it's very very close to the line, skirting danger, which is why for these things rather than protests or disruptions, we'd be better off going and watching silently and vigilant for any behavior that does cross the line. Which should then be publicized and reported to the appropriate authorities.

Just have a bunch of people who aren't willing to validate them to go and watch silently. Take a notebook, document everything. Any community where that happens, where a bunch of stone faced adults with notepads and pens silently document the event but don't participate, will skeeve out and enrage anyone with untoward intentions.