use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~6 users here now
Scientific Consensus is extremely fallible
submitted 1 year ago by [deleted] from self.whatever
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
It doesn't mater if the Creator is good or evil, scientists should be able to assert there is a Creator if there is one.
[–]Insider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
No they shouldn't, it's beyond the reach of mankind's current capabilities. It's like trying to assert what happens after death.
A Creator may not be a conscious being, meaning it's a type of force in the laws of physics, like gravity. In which case, it wouldn't be called a "Creator".
It could, for example, have something to do with dark matter and scientists are working on figuring out what that is right now.
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Insider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)