you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

You just had crap arguments. Why else use censorship, other than your positions are so weak, they would collapse if subjected to scrutiny?

And it's hilarious that the exact same censorship that you were 100% for when you were doing it, got used against you. Then suddenly censorship was unjust and you needed free speech.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I don't know what you're on about, you're making a lot of assumptions and claims and not backing any of them up.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Assumptions and claims? OK.

Claim: LGBdroptheT was pro-censorship.

Claim: LGBdroptheT then got censored.

Claim: LGBdroptheT then came to Saidit. A free speech site.

Claim: LGBdroptheT then did not like free speech. They could hear dissenting opinions!

Claim: LGBdroptheT then implemented censorship, the exact same censorship that got them banned from Reddit!

Assumption: LGBdroptheT learned absolutely nothing from the experience. They remain pro-censorship today. I mean, anti-censorship. I mean...uh, which one? In favor of censorship or against censorship? I'm not quite sure!

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Sounds like you have a problem with LGB dropping the T.

If your concern is actually about censorship, then you should take it up with M7 and SaidIt as a whole. This site allows everything you're upset about.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The best part is where you people learned absolutely nothing from the experience. Something like this is supposed to force you to grow. But no, you're still the same as before - inventing positions people don't hold so you can criticize them for the position you made up. Strawmanning. You didn't actually address any of the claims or assumptions.

Censorship makes you weak. You have no idea what the counter-arguments are, so you do things like invent a flawed argument deliberately so you can think that you won.