I tried listening to it just now, and I gave it a vote, but I've never managed to listen much of his material, mainly because he and commentators like him give the false impression that both political parties are very similar, or they are polar opposites (whereas there are important differences and some common ground). His approaches to the evidence are also annoying, where he continues to force only one narrative, with the tone of 'here's an example', 'here's another example' and continued ranting with affirmations of his points. It's what's wrong with political discourse in general for those who want to polarize the issues in order to get attention, clicks and views. It's a business rather than a genuine study of the issues. I often like the Sunday morning round-table discussions of politics on 3 MSM TV stations, where they try to mix points of view.