you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NiceDickBro 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah and it's more obvious than ever lately it's just another arm pushing whatever the media wants it to say because it ranks so highly on search engines... Granted wikipedia is flawed to begin with because it uses news and media articles as truthful sources to base their articles on.

I'm not sure how long it's been going on, probably years, but the bias lately is so stark I try to avoid it overall.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

When Wikipedia calls someone "far-right" the source is usually a CNN or MSDNC article... and they consider that credible.

[–]NiceDickBro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wikipedia is becoming rational wiki by the day