Yes, I think it is impossible. When I saw the Pyramid of Debate I really thought it was ingenious, because it allows you to be able to debate as you see fit as long as you are actually doing it properly.

What I noticed on r/Denmark is that the rule "Personal Attacks" was responsible for banning sooo many leftists. Pyramid of Debate doesn't allow personal attacks too.
The other rule "Hate Speech" was responsible for banning so many right wing users that it's not even funny. The most hilarious examples were some users that the mods hated and then they would "misinterpret" sarcasm or irony, you know if the user wrote one thing but meant the opposite. So they would write like "Yeah, it's totally because they're foreigners [Disclaimer to mods: This is sarcasm]" which mods would then use as if the user actually meant it... Meanwhile you had leftist comments calling danes "pigs" or "potatoes" or "pig skinned" or the likes to which mods always answered "Yes, we treat each comment based on the context". That one is a meme too btw. "Moderation baseret på kontekst^TM". (Context based Moderation). If you send a modmail to ask them if "This sentence" breaks the rule,, they will always reply that they don't moderate hypotheticals and only deal with concrete comments. 100% biased moderation.
It got worse though. Nowadays they just ban the users if they link the wrong things or say the wrong things.
Discussing race and genetics by linking studies is not allowed there. They will just ban you.

Here they can't do that because it would be the top of the pyramid even if it is so-called "Hate Speech"